CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-3 vs Mazda CX-30
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-3 vs Mazda CX-30

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaMazda
Price (RRP)$27,800$29,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power110kW114kW
0-100 km/h10.9s10.9s
Fuel Economy6.3 L/100km6.3 L/100km
Boot Space264L317L
Towing1,535kg1,200kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Mazda CX-3 & Mazda CX-30

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-3 starts from $27,800 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-30 opens at $29,990. That makes the Mazda CX-3 the more affordable entry point by $2,190.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $30,580 and $32,989 respectively.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-3 features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda CX-30 gets a 8.8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-3 uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 195Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-30 responds with a Petrol making 114kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-30 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-3 measures 4,275mm long on a 2,570mm wheelbase, 120mm shorter than the Mazda CX-30 at 4,395mm (2,655mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-30 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 264L in the Mazda CX-3 and 317L in the Mazda CX-30, giving the Mazda CX-30 a 53L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-3 leads with a 1,535kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 335kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 10.6m

Mazda CX-3 G20 Pure
10.6mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-30 G20 Pure
10.6m
Best
Mazda CX-3 G20 Pure
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-30 G20 Pure
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,796/year for the Mazda CX-3 and $1,796/year for the Mazda CX-30.

Estimated annual total: $1,796 (Mazda CX-3) vs $1,796 (Mazda CX-30). Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-3) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-30). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-3 if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Mazda CX-3 and Mazda CX-30 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-30 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-3 and Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-3 is the cheapest at $27,800 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-30 by $2,190.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-3 uses the least fuel at 6.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Mazda CX-3 and Mazda CX-30 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-30 has the largest boot at 317L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,535kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-30 makes the most power at 114kW.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs