Mazda CX-30 vs Renault Koleos
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 30 Oct 2026, price 30 Oct 2026
Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
$34,760RRP
- cannot be matched: Keyless Entry and Premium Audio not offered
$34,990RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Mazda CX-30 & Renault Koleos
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-30 starts from $34,760 before on-road costs, while the Renault Koleos opens at $34,990. That makes the Mazda CX-30 the more affordable entry point by $230.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. Estimated driveaway prices sit around $33,990 for the Mazda CX-30 and $36,990 for the Renault Koleos.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-30 by roughly $2,565 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
We hold no ANCAP data for the Mazda CX-30. We hold no ANCAP data for the Renault Koleos. With no pair of ratings to compare, the active-safety features in the spec table above are the fairer comparison.
Recalls on our record
Mazda CX-30
- REC-001591 · published 21 Mar 2021The boot's power liftgate may partially lower unexpectedly from the fully opened position when the vehicle is parked facing uphill on a slope in high ambient temperature.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2021
Renault Koleos
- REC-005786 · published 28 Sep 2023Due to a manufacturing defect, the bonnet outer panel and inner frame may not have been bonded correctly.Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2023
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-30 features a 8.8-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Renault Koleos gets a 8.7-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mazda CX-30 stands out with head-up display — features our data doesn't list for the Renault Koleos. The Renault Koleos counters with BOSE audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-30 gets cloth upholstery while the Renault Koleos offers leather. Climate control is 1-zone in the Mazda CX-30 and 2-zone in the Renault Koleos.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-30 uses a Petrol producing 114kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout.
The Renault Koleos responds with a Petrol making 126kW and 226Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.1 seconds.
The Renault Koleos has the clear power advantage at 126kW vs 114kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-30 measures 4,395mm long on a 2,655mm wheelbase, 277mm shorter than the Renault Koleos at 4,672mm (2,705mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Renault Koleos generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 317L in the Mazda CX-30 and 458L in the Renault Koleos, giving the Renault Koleos a 141L advantage.
For towing, the Renault Koleos leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 800kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m to 11.6m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,796/year for the Mazda CX-30 and $2,309/year for the Renault Koleos. That is a $513 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-30.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-30) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Renault Koleos). The Renault Koleos has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Renault Koleos if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Renault Koleos: Top CarSorted Score, 70 vs 66, but the Mazda CX-30 is $230 cheaper
The Renault Koleos comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (70 vs 66), taking 4 of 6 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: technology (Renault Koleos ahead by 38), fuel economy (Mazda CX-30 ahead by 16), practicality (Renault Koleos ahead by 14). The Mazda CX-30 will save you roughly $513 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Renault Koleos has a clear edge. The Renault Koleos adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-30 and Renault Koleos?
The Mazda CX-30 is the cheapest at $34,760 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Renault Koleos by $230.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mazda CX-30 uses the least fuel at 6.3L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
We hold no ANCAP data for Mazda CX-30 and Renault Koleos, so there is no crash result to compare.
Which has the most boot space?
The Renault Koleos has the largest boot at 458L with the seats up.
Which can tow the most?
The Renault Koleos has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Renault Koleos has the longest warranty at 7 years / unlimited km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Renault Koleos makes the most power at 126kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
