Mazda CX-30 vs Suzuki Vitara
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-30 starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Vitara opens at $38,490. That makes the Mazda CX-30 the more affordable entry point by $8,500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $42,339 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the Mazda CX-30 and Suzuki Vitara hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 99% for the Mazda CX-30 and 77% for the Suzuki Vitara.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Suzuki Vitara packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Mazda CX-30.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-30 and 6 in the Suzuki Vitara.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-30 features a 8.8-inch touchscreen, while the Suzuki Vitara gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mazda CX-30 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Suzuki Vitara. The Suzuki Vitara counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-30 uses a Petrol producing 114kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.
The Suzuki Vitara responds with a Petrol making 95kW and 220Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.
The Mazda CX-30 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 95kW. In the real-world sprint, the Suzuki Vitara is 0.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-30 measures 4,395mm long on a 2,655mm wheelbase, 220mm longer than the Suzuki Vitara at 4,175mm (2,500mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-30 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 350L in the Mazda CX-30 and 375L in the Suzuki Vitara, giving the Suzuki Vitara a 25L advantage.
For towing, the Suzuki Vitara leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.2m to 10.6m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-30 and $1,653/year for the Suzuki Vitara. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Vitara.
Estimated annual total: $1,710 (Mazda CX-30) vs $1,653 (Suzuki Vitara). The Suzuki Vitara saves you roughly $57 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-30) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Vitara). The Mazda CX-30 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki Vitara if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Suzuki Vitara takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Suzuki Vitara will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. The Mazda CX-30 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-30 and Suzuki Vitara?
The Mazda CX-30 is the cheapest at $29,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki Vitara by $8,500.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Vitara uses the least fuel at 5.8L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-30 and Suzuki Vitara all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Suzuki Vitara has the largest boot at 375L.
Which can tow the most?
The Suzuki Vitara has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mazda CX-30 has the longest warranty at 5 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-30 makes the most power at 114kW. The Suzuki Vitara is quickest to 100km/h in 10.2s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
