CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-70 vs Lexus RX
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-70 vs Lexus RX

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaLexus
Price (RRP)$76,720$90,350
Power254kW179kW
0-100 km/h7.7s
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km6.9 L/100km
Boot Space598L612L
Towing2,500kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km4yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-70 starts from $76,720 before on-road costs, while the Lexus RX opens at $90,350. That makes the Mazda CX-70 the more affordable entry point by $13,630.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $84,392 and $99,385 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Lexus RX by roughly $1,710 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-70 and Lexus RX hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mazda CX-70 packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Lexus RX.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mazda CX-70 and 8 in the Lexus RX. The Mazda CX-70 adds a 360-degree camera that the Lexus RX misses.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-70 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Lexus RX gets a 14-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments.

The Mazda CX-70 stands out with Bose audio that you will not find on the Lexus RX. The Lexus RX counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate, Lexus Premium Sound audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-70 gets leather upholstery while the Lexus RX offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-70 uses a Petrol producing 254kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout.

The Lexus RX responds with a Hybrid making 179kW and 221Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.7 seconds.

The Mazda CX-70 has the clear power advantage at 254kW vs 179kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-70 measures 5,120mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 230mm longer than the Lexus RX at 4,890mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-70 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 598L in the Mazda CX-70 and 612L in the Lexus RX, giving the Lexus RX a 14L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-70 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m to 11.8m

Mazda CX-70 G50e GT
11.8mTighter
Best
Lexus RX RX350h Luxury
11.8m
Best
Mazda CX-70
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Lexus RX
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Mazda CX-70 and $1,967/year for the Lexus RX. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the Lexus RX.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Mazda CX-70) vs $1,967 (Lexus RX). The Lexus RX saves you roughly $342 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-70) vs 4 years / 100,000km (Lexus RX). The Mazda CX-70 has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: —4yr (Lexus RX).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-70 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Lexus RX if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Lexus's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-70 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Lexus RX will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. The Mazda CX-70 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-70 and Lexus RX?

The Mazda CX-70 is the cheapest at $76,720 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Lexus RX by $13,630.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Lexus RX uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-70 and Lexus RX all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Lexus RX has the largest boot at 612L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mazda CX-70 has the longest warranty at 5 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-70 makes the most power at 254kW.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs