Mazda CX-80 vs Toyota LandCruiser 70
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Mazda CX-80
From $64,490
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
209kW
8.4 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
258L
Toyota LandCruiser 70
From $65,690
Cab Chassis
Diesel
Diesel
150kW
9.6 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
—
Track the Mazda CX-80 & Toyota LandCruiser 70
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-80 starts from $64,490 before on-road costs, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 opens at $65,690. That makes the Mazda CX-80 the more affordable entry point by $1,200.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $70,939 and $72,259 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-80 by roughly $1,710 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-80 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 gets a 6.7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments.
The Mazda CX-80 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and power tailgate that you will not find on the Toyota LandCruiser 70. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-80 uses a Petrol producing 209kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12 seconds.
The Mazda CX-80 has the clear power advantage at 209kW vs 150kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-80 is 3.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-80 measures 4,990mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 245mm shorter than the Toyota LandCruiser 70 at 5,235mm (3,180mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota LandCruiser 70 generally means more rear legroom.
0For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 70 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.6m to 14.4m
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 14.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the Mazda CX-80 and $2,736/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-80.
Estimated annual total: $2,394 (Mazda CX-80) vs $2,736 (Toyota LandCruiser 70). The Mazda CX-80 saves you roughly $342 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mazda CX-80 takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda CX-80 will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-80 and Toyota LandCruiser 70?
The Mazda CX-80 is the cheapest at $64,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota LandCruiser 70 by $1,200.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mazda CX-80 uses the least fuel at 8.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-80 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda CX-80 has the largest boot at 258L.
Which can tow the most?
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-80 makes the most power at 209kW. The Mazda CX-80 is quickest to 100km/h in 9s.
Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet
Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
