Mazda Mazda2 vs Renault Clio
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Mazda Mazda2
From $22,990
Hatchback
Petrol
Petrol
81kW
5 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
250L
Renault Clio
Price TBC
Hatchback
Petrol
H4Bt 0.9 Energy TCe turbo petrol
66kW
4.8 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
300L
Renault Clio: we're still completing price, kerb weight and braked towing.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the Mazda Mazda2 & Renault Clio
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The Mazda Mazda2 stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the Renault Clio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mazda Mazda2 uses a Petrol producing 81kW and 142Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The Renault Clio responds with a H4Bt 0.9 Energy TCe turbo petrol making 66kW and 135Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12.2 seconds.
The Mazda Mazda2 has the clear power advantage at 81kW vs 66kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Mazda Mazda2 is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda Mazda2 measures 4,085mm long on a 2,570mm wheelbase, 22mm longer than the Renault Clio at 4,063mm (2,589mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Renault Clio generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 250L in the Mazda Mazda2 and 300L in the Renault Clio, giving the Renault Clio a 50L advantage.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.8m to 10.6m
Based on 9.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,425/year for the Mazda Mazda2 and $1,368/year for the Renault Clio. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the Renault Clio.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda Mazda2) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Clio). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda Mazda2 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Renault Clio if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The Mazda Mazda2 and Renault Clio trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Renault Clio will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Renault Clio has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda Mazda2 and Renault Clio?
The Mazda Mazda2 is the cheapest at $22,990 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Renault Clio uses the least fuel at 4.8L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Renault Clio holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Mazda Mazda2, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The Renault Clio has the largest boot at 300L.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda Mazda2 makes the most power at 81kW. The Mazda Mazda2 is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
