Mazda Mazda2 vs Renault Clio
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Mazda Mazda2
From $20,495
Hatch
Petrol
1.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16-valve DOHC S-VT
76kW
6.4 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
250L
Renault Clio
Price TBC
Hatch
Petrol
H5Ft 1.2 Energy TCe turbo petrol
88kW
5.6 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
300L
Track the Mazda Mazda2 & Renault Clio
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
Both the Mazda Mazda2 and Renault Clio hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 0 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: core safety systems.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
Drivetrain
The Mazda Mazda2 uses a 1.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16-valve DOHC S-VT producing 76kW and 135Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout.
The Renault Clio responds with a H5Ft 1.2 Energy TCe turbo petrol making 88kW and 190Nm, paired to a 6-speed dual-clutch (edc) automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.4 seconds.
The Renault Clio has the clear power advantage at 88kW vs 76kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda Mazda2 measures 3,900mm long on a 2,490mm wheelbase, 163mm shorter than the Renault Clio at 4,063mm (2,589mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Renault Clio generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 250L in the Mazda Mazda2 and 300L in the Renault Clio, giving the Renault Clio a 50L advantage.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.8m to 10.6m
Based on 9.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Mazda Mazda2 and $1,596/year for the Renault Clio. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the Renault Clio.
Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Mazda Mazda2) vs $1,596 (Renault Clio). The Renault Clio saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 3 years (Mazda Mazda2) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Clio). The Renault Clio has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda Mazda2 if: You or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Renault Clio if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Renault Clio takes 4 of 4 key spec categories. The Renault Clio will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Renault Clio has a clear edge. The Renault Clio adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda Mazda2 and Renault Clio?
The Mazda Mazda2 is the cheapest at $20,495 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Renault Clio uses the least fuel at 5.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mazda Mazda2 and Renault Clio all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Renault Clio has the largest boot at 300L.
Which has the best warranty?
The Renault Clio has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Renault Clio makes the most power at 88kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
