CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsRenault Clio vs Toyota Corolla Hatch
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Renault Clio vs Toyota Corolla Hatch

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Renault Clio: we're still completing price, kerb weight and braked towing.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecRenaultToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$32,110
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power66kW103kW
0-100 km/h12.2s8.1s
Fuel Economy4.8 L/100km4 L/100km
Boot Space300L217L
Towing1,200kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Renault Clio & Toyota Corolla Hatch

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Toyota Corolla Hatch counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Renault Clio uses a H4Bt 0.9 Energy TCe turbo petrol producing 66kW and 135Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 12.2 seconds.

The Toyota Corolla Hatch responds with a 1.8L 4-cyl VVT-i Hybrid making 103kW and 142Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.1 seconds.

The Toyota Corolla Hatch has the clear power advantage at 103kW vs 66kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Toyota Corolla Hatch is 4.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Renault Clio measures 4,063mm long on a 2,589mm wheelbase, 312mm shorter than the Toyota Corolla Hatch at 4,375mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Corolla Hatch generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 300L in the Renault Clio and 217L in the Toyota Corolla Hatch, giving the Renault Clio a 83L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 10.8m

TightestRenault Clio Expression (0.9 TCe)Tightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Renault Clio Expression (0.9 TCe)
10.6mTighter
Best
Toyota Corolla Hatch Ascent Sport Hybrid
10.8m
Worst
Renault Clio Expression (0.9 TCe)
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Corolla Hatch Ascent Sport Hybrid
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestRenault ClioTightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Renault ClioTightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota Corolla Hatch10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,368/year for the Renault Clio and $1,140/year for the Toyota Corolla Hatch. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Corolla Hatch.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Clio) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Corolla Hatch). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Renault Clio if: You need more boot space, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Corolla Hatch if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota Corolla Hatch takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. The Toyota Corolla Hatch will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Renault Clio has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Renault Clio and Toyota Corolla Hatch?

The Toyota Corolla Hatch is the cheapest at $32,110 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Corolla Hatch uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Renault Clio holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Toyota Corolla Hatch, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Renault Clio has the largest boot at 300L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Corolla Hatch has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Corolla Hatch makes the most power at 103kW. The Toyota Corolla Hatch is quickest to 100km/h in 8.1s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars · Best hybrid cars