CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG 7 vs Mazda CX-60
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG 7 vs Mazda CX-60

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMGMazda
Price (RRP)$44,990$44,240
Power170kW138kW
0-100 km/h7.4s
Fuel Economy8 L/100km7.5 L/100km
Boot Space375L570L
Towing750kg1,800kg
Warranty10yr / 250k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the MG 7 & Mazda CX-60

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. No dealer spin, unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The MG 7 starts from $44,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-60 opens at $44,240. That makes the Mazda CX-60 the more affordable entry point by $750.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $49,489 and $48,664 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the MG 7 and Mazda CX-60 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The MG 7 packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Mazda CX-60.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the MG 7 and 7 in the Mazda CX-60. The MG 7 adds a 360-degree camera that the Mazda CX-60 misses.

Feature Showdown

The MG 7 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-60 gets a 10.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MG 7 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate, Bose audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mazda CX-60. The Mazda CX-60 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the MG 7 gets leather upholstery while the Mazda CX-60 offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The MG 7 uses a 2.0L Turbo Petrol producing 170kW and 380Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout.

The Mazda CX-60 responds with a Petrol making 138kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.4 seconds.

The MG 7 has the clear power advantage at 170kW vs 138kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG 7 measures 4,884mm long on a 2,778mm wheelbase, 144mm longer than the Mazda CX-60 at 4,740mm (2,870mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 375L in the MG 7 and 570L in the Mazda CX-60, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 195L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-60 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 1,050kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m diameter

Good

Mazda CX-60 G25 Pure
10.8m
Mazda CX-60 G25 Pure
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,280/year for the MG 7 and $2,138/year for the Mazda CX-60. That is a $142 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-60.

Estimated annual total: $2,280 (MG 7) vs $2,138 (Mazda CX-60). The Mazda CX-60 saves you roughly $142 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG 7) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60). The MG 7 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG 7 if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-60 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda CX-60 will save you roughly $142 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-60 has a clear edge. The MG 7 adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MG 7 and Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is the cheapest at $44,240 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MG 7 by $750.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-60 uses the least fuel at 7.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — MG 7 and Mazda CX-60 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-60 has the largest boot at 570L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-60 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG 7 has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG 7 makes the most power at 170kW.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Fastbacks · All SUVs