CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG HS vs Hyundai Kona
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG HS vs Hyundai Kona

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMGHyundai
Price (RRP)$33,990$32,500
Power125kW110kW
0-100 km/h9.6s9.9s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km6.6 L/100km
Boot Space507L361L
Towing1,500kg1,300kg
Warranty10yr / 250k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the MG HS & Hyundai Kona

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. No dealer spin, unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The MG HS starts from $33,990 before on-road costs, while the Hyundai Kona opens at $32,500. That makes the Hyundai Kona the more affordable entry point by $1,490.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $37,389 and $35,750 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the MG HS and Hyundai Kona hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the MG HS and 80% for the Hyundai Kona.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The MG HS packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Hyundai Kona.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the MG HS and 7 in the Hyundai Kona.

Feature Showdown

The MG HS features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Hyundai Kona gets a 12.3-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MG HS stands out with panoramic roof and power tailgate that you will not find on the Hyundai Kona. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the MG HS gets cloth upholstery while the Hyundai Kona offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The MG HS uses a Petrol producing 125kW and 275Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed dct to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.6 seconds.

The Hyundai Kona responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 180Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.9 seconds.

The MG HS has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the MG HS is 0.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG HS measures 4,655mm long on a 2,765mm wheelbase, 305mm longer than the Hyundai Kona at 4,350mm (2,660mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG HS generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 507L in the MG HS and 361L in the Hyundai Kona, giving the MG HS a 146L advantage.

For towing, the MG HS leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,300kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.0m

Hyundai Kona 2.0 FWD
10.6mTighter
Best
MG HS Vibe
11.0m
Worst
MG HS Vibe
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Hyundai Kona 2.0 FWD
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the MG HS and $1,881/year for the Hyundai Kona. That is a $86 annual difference in favour of the Hyundai Kona.

Estimated annual total: $1,967 (MG HS) vs $1,881 (Hyundai Kona). The Hyundai Kona saves you roughly $86 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG HS) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai Kona). The MG HS has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG HS if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Hyundai Kona if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG HS takes 5 of 7 key spec categories. The Hyundai Kona will save you roughly $86 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the MG HS has a clear edge. The MG HS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MG HS and Hyundai Kona?

The Hyundai Kona is the cheapest at $32,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MG HS by $1,490.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Hyundai Kona uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — MG HS and Hyundai Kona all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The MG HS has the largest boot at 507L.

Which can tow the most?

The MG HS has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG HS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG HS makes the most power at 125kW. The MG HS is quickest to 100km/h in 9.6s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs