CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG MG3 vs Mazda Mazda2
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG MG3 vs Mazda Mazda2

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMGMazda
Price (RRP)$20,990$20,495
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power81kW76kW
0-100 km/h10.8s
Fuel Economy6 L/100km6.4 L/100km
Boot Space293L250L
Towing500kg700kg
Warranty10yr / 250k km3yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety4 Stars5 Stars

Track the MG MG3 & Mazda Mazda2

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The MG MG3 starts from $20,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda Mazda2 opens at $20,495. That makes the Mazda Mazda2 the more affordable entry point by $495.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $23,089 and $22,545 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

The Mazda Mazda2 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the MG MG3.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The MG MG3 packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Mazda Mazda2.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems. Airbag count is 6 in the MG MG3 and 6 in the Mazda Mazda2.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The MG MG3 stands out with Apple CarPlay and power tailgate that you will not find on the Mazda Mazda2. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The MG MG3 uses a Petrol producing 81kW and 142Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.8 seconds.

The Mazda Mazda2 responds with a 1.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16-valve DOHC S-VT making 76kW and 135Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving the front wheels.

The MG MG3 has the clear power advantage at 81kW vs 76kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG MG3 measures 4,113mm long on a 2,570mm wheelbase, 213mm longer than the Mazda Mazda2 at 3,900mm (2,490mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG MG3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 293L in the MG MG3 and 250L in the Mazda Mazda2, giving the MG MG3 a 43L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda Mazda2 leads with a 700kg braked capacity vs 500kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.8m to 10.2m

TightestMazda Mazda2 Genki Hatch 1.5 ManualTightest turn at 9.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda Mazda2 Genki Hatch 1.5 Manual
9.8mTighter
Best
MG MG3 Vibe
10.2m
Worst
MG3 Vibe
10.2m · Good

Based on 10.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda2 Genki Hatch 1.5 Manual
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda Mazda2Tightest turn at 9.8m, needs the least road to swing around
MG MG310.2 m
Good△ 3-point
Mazda Mazda2Tightest9.8 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the MG MG3 and $1,824/year for the Mazda Mazda2. That is a $114 annual difference in favour of the MG MG3.

Estimated annual total: $1,710 (MG MG3) vs $1,824 (Mazda Mazda2). The MG MG3 saves you roughly $114 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG MG3) vs 3 years (Mazda Mazda2). The MG MG3 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG MG3 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda Mazda2 if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG MG3 takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The MG MG3 will save you roughly $114 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the MG MG3 has a clear edge. The MG MG3 adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MG MG3 and Mazda Mazda2?

The Mazda Mazda2 is the cheapest at $20,495 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MG MG3 by $495.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The MG MG3 uses the least fuel at 6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

The Mazda Mazda2 has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The MG MG3 has the largest boot at 293L.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG MG3 has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG MG3 makes the most power at 81kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars