MG QS vs KGM Rexton
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The MG QS starts from $46,990 before on-road costs, while the KGM Rexton opens at $50,000. That makes the MG QS the more affordable entry point by $3,010.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $51,689 and $55,000 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the MG QS and KGM Rexton hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The MG QS packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the KGM Rexton.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the MG QS and 6 in the KGM Rexton. The MG QS adds a 360-degree camera that the KGM Rexton misses.
Feature Showdown
The MG QS features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the KGM Rexton gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The MG QS stands out with panoramic roof that you will not find on the KGM Rexton. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the MG QS gets fabric upholstery while the KGM Rexton offers leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the MG QS and 2-zone in the KGM Rexton.
Drivetrain
The MG QS uses a 2.0L Turbo Petrol producing 153kW and 360Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout.
The KGM Rexton responds with a Turbo DDi Diesel making 149kW and 441Nm, paired to a 8-speed automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.
The MG QS has the clear power advantage at 153kW vs 149kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The MG QS measures 4,983mm long on a 2,915mm wheelbase, 133mm longer than the KGM Rexton at 4,850mm (2,865mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG QS generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 203L in the MG QS and 236L in the KGM Rexton, giving the KGM Rexton a 33L advantage.
For towing, the KGM Rexton leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.6m diameter
Average
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the MG QS and $2,480/year for the KGM Rexton. That is a $86 annual difference in favour of the MG QS.
Estimated annual total: $2,394 (MG QS) vs $2,480 (KGM Rexton). The MG QS saves you roughly $86 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG QS) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Rexton). The MG QS has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the MG QS if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the KGM Rexton if: You need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The MG QS takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The MG QS will save you roughly $86 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the KGM Rexton has a clear edge. The MG QS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
