CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG ZS EV vs Toyota C-HR
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG ZS EV vs Toyota C-HR

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMGToyota
Price (RRP)$43,990$46,940
Range (WLTP)440km
Battery72.6 kWh
Power115kW103kW
0-100 km/h8.2s8.2s
Max DC Charge92kW
10-80% Charge Time36 min
Fuel Economy4.7 L/100km
Boot Space359L388L
Towing725kg
Warranty10yr / 250k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The MG ZS EV starts from $43,990 before on-road costs, while the Toyota C-HR opens at $46,940. That makes the MG ZS EV the more affordable entry point by $2,950.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $48,389 and $51,634 respectively.

The MG ZS EV qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Toyota C-HR, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The MG ZS EV features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Toyota C-HR gets a 12.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MG ZS EV stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Toyota C-HR. The Toyota C-HR counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The MG ZS EV uses a Electric Motor producing 115kW and 280Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.2 seconds.

The Toyota C-HR responds with a Petrol making 103kW and 188Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.2 seconds.

The MG ZS EV has the clear power advantage at 115kW vs 103kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG ZS EV measures 4,323mm long on a 2,585mm wheelbase, 37mm shorter than the Toyota C-HR at 4,360mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota C-HR generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 359L in the MG ZS EV and 388L in the Toyota C-HR, giving the Toyota C-HR a 29L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m diameter

Good

Toyota C-HR GXL
10.4m
Toyota C-HR
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG ZS EV) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota C-HR). The MG ZS EV has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG ZS EV if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota C-HR if: You need more boot space, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG ZS EV takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The MG ZS EV adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MG ZS EV and Toyota C-HR?

The MG ZS EV is the cheapest at $43,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota C-HR by $2,950.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota C-HR uses the least fuel at 4.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Toyota C-HR all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota C-HR has the largest boot at 388L.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG ZS EV has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG ZS EV makes the most power at 115kW.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs