CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG ZS vs Mahindra XUV 3XO
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG ZS vs Mahindra XUV 3XO

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMGMahindra
Price (RRP)$22,990$21,800
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power81kW82kW
0-100 km/h10.4s
Fuel Economy6.7 L/100km6.5 L/100km
Boot Space443L364L
Towing500kg
Warranty10yr / 250k km7yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the MG ZS & Mahindra XUV 3XO

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The MG ZS starts from $22,990 before on-road costs, while the Mahindra XUV 3XO opens at $21,800. That makes the Mahindra XUV 3XO the more affordable entry point by $1,190.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $25,289 and $23,980 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The MG ZS features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Mahindra XUV 3XO gets a 10.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MG ZS stands out with power tailgate that you will not find on the Mahindra XUV 3XO. The Mahindra XUV 3XO counters with wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The MG ZS uses a Petrol producing 81kW and 140Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout.

The Mahindra XUV 3XO responds with a Petrol making 82kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.4 seconds.

The Mahindra XUV 3XO has the clear power advantage at 82kW vs 81kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG ZS measures 4,430mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 440mm longer than the Mahindra XUV 3XO at 3,990mm (2,600mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG ZS generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 443L in the MG ZS and 364L in the Mahindra XUV 3XO, giving the MG ZS a 79L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.0m

TightestMahindra XUV 3XO AX5LTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5L
10.6mTighter
Best
MG ZS Vibe
11.0m
Worst
MG ZS Vibe
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5L
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMahindra XUV 3XOTightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
MG ZS11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Mahindra XUV 3XOTightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,910/year for the MG ZS and $1,853/year for the Mahindra XUV 3XO. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the Mahindra XUV 3XO.

Estimated annual total: $1,910 (MG ZS) vs $1,853 (Mahindra XUV 3XO). The Mahindra XUV 3XO saves you roughly $57 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG ZS) vs 7 years / 150,000km (Mahindra XUV 3XO). The MG ZS has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG ZS if: You need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mahindra XUV 3XO if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Mahindra's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mahindra XUV 3XO takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mahindra XUV 3XO will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the MG ZS has a clear edge. The MG ZS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MG ZS and Mahindra XUV 3XO?

The Mahindra XUV 3XO is the cheapest at $21,800 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MG ZS by $1,190.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mahindra XUV 3XO uses the least fuel at 6.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — MG ZS all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The MG ZS has the largest boot at 443L.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG ZS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mahindra XUV 3XO makes the most power at 82kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs