CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMINI Aceman vs Toyota Kluger
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MINI Aceman vs Toyota Kluger

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMINIToyota
Price (RRP)$60,990$62,410
Range (WLTP)352km
Battery54.2 kWh
Power160kW184kW
0-100 km/h7.1s7.9s
Max DC Charge95kW
10-80% Charge Time31 min
Fuel Economy5.6 L/100km
Boot Space300L241L
Towing2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The MINI Aceman starts from $60,990 before on-road costs, while the Toyota Kluger opens at $62,410. That makes the MINI Aceman the more affordable entry point by $1,420.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $67,089 and $68,651 respectively.

The MINI Aceman qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Toyota Kluger, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the MINI Aceman and Toyota Kluger hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 83% for the MINI Aceman and 96% for the Toyota Kluger.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The MINI Aceman packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Toyota Kluger.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the MINI Aceman and 7 in the Toyota Kluger.

Feature Showdown

The MINI Aceman features a 9.4-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota Kluger gets a 8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MINI Aceman stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof, Harman Kardon audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Toyota Kluger. The Toyota Kluger counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the MINI Aceman gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Toyota Kluger offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the MINI Aceman and 3-zone in the Toyota Kluger.

Drivetrain

The MINI Aceman uses a Electric producing 160kW and 330Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.1 seconds.

The Toyota Kluger responds with a 2.5L 4-cyl Hybrid making 184kW and 242Nm, paired to a cvt driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.9 seconds.

The Toyota Kluger has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 160kW. In the real-world sprint, the MINI Aceman is 0.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MINI Aceman measures 4,073mm long on a 2,606mm wheelbase, 893mm shorter than the Toyota Kluger at 4,966mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Kluger generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 300L in the MINI Aceman and 241L in the Toyota Kluger, giving the MINI Aceman a 59L advantage. The Toyota Kluger seats 7 vs 5.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.4m

MINI Aceman SE Favoured
10.6mTighter
Best
Toyota Kluger GX Hybrid AWD
11.4m
Worst
MINI Aceman
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Kluger
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (MINI Aceman) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Kluger). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MINI Aceman if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer MINI's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Kluger if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MINI Aceman takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the MINI Aceman has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MINI Aceman and Toyota Kluger?

The MINI Aceman is the cheapest at $60,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota Kluger by $1,420.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Kluger uses the least fuel at 5.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — MINI Aceman and Toyota Kluger all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The MINI Aceman has the largest boot at 300L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Kluger has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Kluger makes the most power at 184kW. The MINI Aceman is quickest to 100km/h in 7.1s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs