CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMitsubishi Outlander vs GWM Tank 300
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mitsubishi Outlander vs GWM Tank 300

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMitsubishiGWM
Price (RRP)$39,990$49,990
Power135kW167kW
0-100 km/h8.7s9.5s
Fuel Economy7.3 L/100km9.5 L/100km
Boot Space478L550L
Towing2,000kg2,000kg
Warranty10yr / 200k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mitsubishi Outlander starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the GWM Tank 300 opens at $49,990. That makes the Mitsubishi Outlander the more affordable entry point by $10,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $54,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi Outlander by roughly $3,135 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mitsubishi Outlander and GWM Tank 300 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the Mitsubishi Outlander and 88% for the GWM Tank 300.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GWM Tank 300 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Mitsubishi Outlander.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mitsubishi Outlander and 6 in the GWM Tank 300.

Feature Showdown

The Mitsubishi Outlander features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the GWM Tank 300 gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mitsubishi Outlander stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the GWM Tank 300. The GWM Tank 300 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, panoramic roof and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mitsubishi Outlander uses a Petrol producing 135kW and 244Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.7 seconds.

The GWM Tank 300 responds with a Petrol making 167kW and 387Nm, paired to a auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The GWM Tank 300 has the clear power advantage at 167kW vs 135kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mitsubishi Outlander measures 4,710mm long on a 2,705mm wheelbase, 5mm shorter than the GWM Tank 300 at 4,715mm (2,750mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Tank 300 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 478L in the Mitsubishi Outlander and 550L in the GWM Tank 300, giving the GWM Tank 300 a 72L advantage.

For towing, the GWM Tank 300 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 12.0m

Mitsubishi Outlander ES 2WD
11.0mTighter
Best
GWM Tank 300 Lux
12.0m
Worst
Mitsubishi Outlander
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GWM Tank 300
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,081/year for the Mitsubishi Outlander and $2,708/year for the GWM Tank 300. That is a $627 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Outlander.

Estimated annual total: $2,081 (Mitsubishi Outlander) vs $2,708 (GWM Tank 300). The Mitsubishi Outlander saves you roughly $627 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Outlander) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 300). The Mitsubishi Outlander has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mitsubishi Outlander if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GWM Tank 300 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mitsubishi Outlander takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mitsubishi Outlander will save you roughly $627 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Tank 300 has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Outlander adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Outlander and GWM Tank 300?

The Mitsubishi Outlander is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Tank 300 by $10,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi Outlander uses the least fuel at 7.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Outlander and GWM Tank 300 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The GWM Tank 300 has the largest boot at 550L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mitsubishi Outlander has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Outlander has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM Tank 300 makes the most power at 167kW. The Mitsubishi Outlander is quickest to 100km/h in 8.7s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs