Mitsubishi Outlander vs Skoda Kodiaq
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Mitsubishi Outlander starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Kodiaq opens at $54,990. That makes the Mitsubishi Outlander the more affordable entry point by $15,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $60,489 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Kodiaq by roughly $1,285 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Mitsubishi Outlander and Skoda Kodiaq hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the Mitsubishi Outlander and 89% for the Skoda Kodiaq.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Skoda Kodiaq packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Mitsubishi Outlander.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mitsubishi Outlander and 7 in the Skoda Kodiaq.
Feature Showdown
The Mitsubishi Outlander features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Skoda Kodiaq gets a 13-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mitsubishi Outlander stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Skoda Kodiaq. The Skoda Kodiaq counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mitsubishi Outlander uses a Petrol producing 135kW and 244Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.7 seconds.
The Skoda Kodiaq responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.1 seconds.
The Mitsubishi Outlander has the clear power advantage at 135kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mitsubishi Outlander measures 4,710mm long on a 2,705mm wheelbase, 48mm shorter than the Skoda Kodiaq at 4,758mm (2,791mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Kodiaq generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 478L in the Mitsubishi Outlander and 270L in the Skoda Kodiaq, giving the Mitsubishi Outlander a 208L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1500L vs 2005L. The Skoda Kodiaq seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Skoda Kodiaq leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.0m to 11.4m
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,081/year for the Mitsubishi Outlander and $1,824/year for the Skoda Kodiaq. That is a $257 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Kodiaq.
Estimated annual total: $2,081 (Mitsubishi Outlander) vs $1,824 (Skoda Kodiaq). The Skoda Kodiaq saves you roughly $257 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Outlander) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq). The Mitsubishi Outlander has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mitsubishi Outlander if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mitsubishi Outlander takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Skoda Kodiaq will save you roughly $257 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mitsubishi Outlander has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Outlander adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Outlander and Skoda Kodiaq?
The Mitsubishi Outlander is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Kodiaq by $15,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Skoda Kodiaq uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Outlander and Skoda Kodiaq all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mitsubishi Outlander has the largest boot at 478L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mitsubishi Outlander has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mitsubishi Outlander has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mitsubishi Outlander makes the most power at 135kW. The Mitsubishi Outlander is quickest to 100km/h in 8.7s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
