CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMitsubishi Pajero Sport vs Kia Sportage
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport vs Kia Sportage

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMitsubishiKia
Price (RRP)TBC$38,490
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power133kW115kW
0-100 km/h11.5s
Fuel Economy8 L/100km8.1 L/100km
Boot Space131L543L
Towing3,100kg1,650kg
Warranty10yr / 200k km7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport & Kia Sportage

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the Kia Sportage gets a 12.3-inch display and 4-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport gets leather upholstery while the Kia Sportage offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport and 1-zone in the Kia Sportage.

Drivetrain

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport uses a Diesel producing 133kW and 430Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.

The Kia Sportage responds with a Petrol making 115kW and 192Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels.

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has the clear power advantage at 133kW vs 115kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport measures 4,840mm long on a 2,800mm wheelbase, 155mm longer than the Kia Sportage at 4,685mm (2,755mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 131L in the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport and 543L in the Kia Sportage, giving the Kia Sportage a 412L advantage. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport leads with a 3,100kg braked capacity vs 1,650kg. That 1,450kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.4m

TightestMitsubishi Pajero Sport GLSTightest turn at 11.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport GLS
11.2mTighter
Best
Kia Sportage S FWD Petrol
11.4m
Worst
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport GLS
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Kia Sportage S FWD Petrol
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMitsubishi Pajero SportTightest turn at 11.2m, needs the least road to swing around
Mitsubishi Pajero SportTightest11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Kia Sportage11.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,280/year for the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport and $2,309/year for the Kia Sportage. That is a $29 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport.

Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Pajero Sport) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Sportage). The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Kia Sportage if: You need more boot space, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport will save you roughly $29 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Kia Sportage has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Pajero Sport and Kia Sportage?

The Kia Sportage is the cheapest at $38,490 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport uses the least fuel at 8L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Kia Sportage holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia Sportage has the largest boot at 543L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,100kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport makes the most power at 133kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs