Mitsubishi Triton vs Proton Jumbuck
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 13 Aug 2026, price 13 Aug 2026
Driver assistance, as the maker lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
Proton Jumbuck: we're still completing price, seat count, 0-100km/h and turning circle.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
$43,690RRP
- no option data for this car
No price
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Mitsubishi Triton & Proton Jumbuck
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Recalls on our record
Mitsubishi Triton
- REC-005634 · published 20 Mar 2023The product was sold without the warning information that is required for products containing button/coin batteries.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2022
- REC-001049 · published 6 May 2019The rivets for the side step cover may corrode and fracture, especially if usage involves exposure to salt or anti-freeze agent.Year range on the notice: 2015 - 2017
- REC-001032 · published 29 Jun 2016The turn signal and lighting switch connector terminals may become worn during switch operation due to insufficient rigidity.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
- 3 more on the model page.
Proton Jumbuck
None open on our record
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The Mitsubishi Triton stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the Proton Jumbuck. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mitsubishi Triton uses a Diesel producing 150kW and 470Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.3 seconds.
The Proton Jumbuck lines up making 64kW and 124Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving the front wheels.
The Mitsubishi Triton has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 64kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mitsubishi Triton measures 5,320mm long on a 3,130mm wheelbase, 865mm longer than the Proton Jumbuck at 4,455mm (2,600mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Triton generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Mitsubishi Triton leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 2,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.4m diameter
Large
Based on 12.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Large
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 10.7 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: 3-point turn
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.9 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: careful, tight swing
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,138/year for the Mitsubishi Triton and $1,881/year for the Proton Jumbuck. That is a $257 annual difference in favour of the Proton Jumbuck.
Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Triton) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Proton Jumbuck). The Mitsubishi Triton has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mitsubishi Triton if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Proton Jumbuck if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Proton's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The CarSorted Score calls this a draw (77 vs 51). The Mitsubishi Triton and Proton Jumbuck trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Proton Jumbuck will save you roughly $257 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Triton adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Triton and Proton Jumbuck?
The Mitsubishi Triton is the cheapest at $43,690 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Proton Jumbuck uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Mitsubishi Triton holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Proton Jumbuck, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which can tow the most?
The Mitsubishi Triton has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mitsubishi Triton has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mitsubishi Triton makes the most power at 150kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
