CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsRenault Captur vs Ford Everest
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Renault Captur vs Ford Everest

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Renault Captur: we're still completing price, ground clearance and braked towing.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecRenaultFord
Price (RRP)TBC$68,990
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power113kW184kW
0-100 km/h8.6s
Fuel Economy6.6 L/100km8.5 L/100km
Boot Space422L259L
Towing3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Renault Captur & Ford Everest

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Renault Captur and Ford Everest hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 96% for the Renault Captur and 86% for the Ford Everest.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Ford Everest, against 4 on the Renault Captur.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, adaptive cruise control. Airbag count is 6 in the Renault Captur and 9 in the Ford Everest.

Feature Showdown

The Renault Captur features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the Ford Everest gets a 12-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Renault Captur stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the Ford Everest. The Ford Everest counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Renault Captur uses a 1.3 TCe 155 EDC producing 113kW and 270Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed dual-clutch automatic (edc) to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.6 seconds.

The Ford Everest responds with a Diesel V6 Turbo making 184kW and 600Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels.

The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 113kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Renault Captur measures 4,221mm long on a 2,639mm wheelbase, 757mm shorter than the Ford Everest at 4,978mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 422L in the Renault Captur and 259L in the Ford Everest, giving the Renault Captur a 163L advantage. The Ford Everest seats 7 vs 5.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1m to 11.8m

TightestRenault Captur Zen TCe 155Tightest turn at 11.1m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Renault Captur Zen TCe 155
11.1mTighter
Best
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m
Worst
Renault Captur Zen TCe 155
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestRenault CapturTightest turn at 11.1m, needs the least road to swing around
Renault CapturTightest11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Ford Everest11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,881/year for the Renault Captur and $2,423/year for the Ford Everest. That is a $542 annual difference in favour of the Renault Captur.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Captur) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Renault Captur if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Renault Captur takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The Renault Captur will save you roughly $542 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Renault Captur has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Renault Captur and Ford Everest?

The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $68,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Renault Captur uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: Renault Captur and Ford Everest all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Renault Captur has the largest boot at 422L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Everest makes the most power at 184kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs