Renault Symbioz vs Mazda CX-60
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Renault Symbioz
From $42,990
SUV
Hybrid
Inline 4
116kW
4.7 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
492L
Mazda CX-60
From $44,240
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
138kW
7.5 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
570L
Track the Renault Symbioz & Mazda CX-60
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Renault Symbioz starts from $42,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-60 opens at $44,240. That makes the Renault Symbioz the more affordable entry point by $1,250.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $47,289 and $48,664 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Renault Symbioz by roughly $3,990 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Renault Symbioz features a 10.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-60 gets a 10.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments.
The Renault Symbioz stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Mazda CX-60. The Mazda CX-60 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Renault Symbioz uses a Inline 4 producing 116kW and 149Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.6 seconds.
The Mazda CX-60 responds with a Petrol making 138kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.4 seconds.
The Mazda CX-60 has the clear power advantage at 138kW vs 116kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-60 is 3.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Renault Symbioz measures 4,413mm long on a 2,638mm wheelbase, 327mm shorter than the Mazda CX-60 at 4,740mm (2,870mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 492L in the Renault Symbioz and 570L in the Mazda CX-60, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 78L advantage.
For towing, the Mazda CX-60 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 1,050kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.8m to 11.1m
Based on 11.1m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,340/year for the Renault Symbioz and $2,138/year for the Mazda CX-60. That is a $798 annual difference in favour of the Renault Symbioz.
Estimated annual total: $1,340 (Renault Symbioz) vs $2,138 (Mazda CX-60). The Renault Symbioz saves you roughly $798 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Symbioz) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Renault Symbioz if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mazda CX-60 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Renault Symbioz will save you roughly $798 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-60 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Renault Symbioz and Mazda CX-60?
The Renault Symbioz is the cheapest at $42,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-60 by $1,250.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Renault Symbioz uses the least fuel at 4.7L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-60 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda CX-60 has the largest boot at 570L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda CX-60 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-60 makes the most power at 138kW. The Mazda CX-60 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.4s.
Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet
Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
