CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsRenault Symbioz vs Mazda CX-60
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Renault Symbioz vs Mazda CX-60

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecRenaultMazda
Price (RRP)$44,990$44,240
Power70kW138kW
0-100 km/h10.6s7.4s
Fuel Economy4.6 L/100km6.7 L/100km
Boot Space434L570L
Towing750kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Renault Symbioz starts from $44,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-60 opens at $44,240. That makes the Mazda CX-60 the more affordable entry point by $750.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $49,489 and $48,664 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Renault Symbioz by roughly $2,995 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Renault Symbioz and Mazda CX-60 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 3 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking.

Feature Showdown

The Renault Symbioz features a 10.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-60 gets a 10.3-inch display.

The Renault Symbioz stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Mazda CX-60. The Mazda CX-60 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Renault Symbioz uses a Inline 4 producing 70kW and 149Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.6 seconds.

The Mazda CX-60 responds with a Petrol making 138kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.4 seconds.

The Mazda CX-60 has the clear power advantage at 138kW vs 70kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-60 is 3.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Renault Symbioz measures 4,413mm long on a 2,638mm wheelbase, 332mm shorter than the Mazda CX-60 at 4,745mm (2,870mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 434L in the Renault Symbioz and 570L in the Mazda CX-60, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 136L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-60 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 1,250kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m diameter

Average

Mazda CX-60 G25 Pure
11.4m
Mazda CX-60
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,311/year for the Renault Symbioz and $1,910/year for the Mazda CX-60. That is a $599 annual difference in favour of the Renault Symbioz.

Estimated annual total: $1,311 (Renault Symbioz) vs $1,910 (Mazda CX-60). The Renault Symbioz saves you roughly $599 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Symbioz) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Renault Symbioz if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-60 takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Renault Symbioz will save you roughly $599 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-60 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs