Renault Trafic vs Suzuki APV
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Vans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Renault Trafic
From $52,990
Van
Diesel
2.0L Diesel
125kW
6.2 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
—
Suzuki APV
Price TBC
Van
Petrol
G16A
68kW
8.2 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
—
Suzuki APV: we're still completing price, 0-100km/h, warranty and braked towing.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the Renault Trafic & Suzuki APV
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The Renault Trafic stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the Suzuki APV. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Renault Trafic gets cloth upholstery while the Suzuki APV offers vinyl.
Drivetrain
The Renault Trafic uses a 2.0L Diesel producing 125kW and 380Nm of torque, sent through a 9-speed automatic to a FWD layout.
The Suzuki APV responds with a G16A making 68kW and 127Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving the rear wheels.
The Renault Trafic has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 68kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Renault Trafic measures 5,080mm long on a 3,098mm wheelbase, 925mm longer than the Suzuki APV at 4,155mm (2,625mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Renault Trafic generally means more rear legroom.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.8m diameter
Excellent
Based on 9.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Excellent
Clears the U-turn in one swing
Needs about 8.4 m of road; you have 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: clears in one
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.7 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: swings in
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,767/year for the Renault Trafic and $2,337/year for the Suzuki APV. That is a $570 annual difference in favour of the Renault Trafic.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Renault Trafic if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki APV if: You or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Renault Trafic takes 2 of 2 key spec categories. The Renault Trafic will save you roughly $570 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Renault Trafic and Suzuki APV?
The Renault Trafic is the cheapest at $52,990 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Renault Trafic uses the least fuel at 6.2L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of Renault Trafic and Suzuki APV carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.
Which can tow the most?
The Renault Trafic has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Renault Trafic makes the most power at 125kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
