Skoda Enyaq vs MINI Aceman
Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 28 Aug 2026, price 25 Jun 2026
Driver assistance, as the maker lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
$59,990RRP
- no option data for this car
$60,990RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Skoda Enyaq & MINI Aceman
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Skoda Enyaq starts from $59,990 before on-road costs, while the MINI Aceman opens at $60,990. That makes the Skoda Enyaq the more affordable entry point by $1,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $65,989 and $67,089 respectively.
Both models currently qualify for the electric-vehicle Fringe Benefits Tax exemption (battery-electric and under the $91,661 threshold; battery-electric and under the $91,661 threshold), a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases.
Safety Rundown
Both the Skoda Enyaq and MINI Aceman hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 94% for the Skoda Enyaq and 83% for the MINI Aceman.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on the MINI Aceman, against 5 on the Skoda Enyaq.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the Skoda Enyaq and 9 in the MINI Aceman.
Recalls on our record
Skoda Enyaq
None open on our record
MINI Aceman
None open on our record
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
77kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 175kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 175kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
How long to charge
49.2kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 95kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 95kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The Skoda Enyaq features a 13-inch touchscreen paired with a 5.3-inch digital dash, while the MINI Aceman gets a 9.4-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Skoda Enyaq stands out with head-up display, heated front seats, ventilated seats and power tailgate — features our data doesn't list for the MINI Aceman. The MINI Aceman counters with panoramic roof, Harman Kardon audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Skoda Enyaq gets synthetic leather upholstery while the MINI Aceman offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Skoda Enyaq and 2-zone in the MINI Aceman.
Drivetrain
The Skoda Enyaq uses a Electric Motor producing 210kW and 545Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.7 seconds.
The MINI Aceman responds with a Electric making 160kW and 330Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.1 seconds.
The Skoda Enyaq has the clear power advantage at 210kW vs 160kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Skoda Enyaq is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Battery: 82kWh (Skoda Enyaq) vs 54.2kWh (MINI Aceman), giving WLTP ranges of 575km and 352km. DC fast charging peaks at 175kW (Skoda Enyaq) vs 95kW (MINI Aceman).
Space & Comfort
The Skoda Enyaq measures 4,658mm long on a 2,766mm wheelbase, 585mm longer than the MINI Aceman at 4,073mm (2,606mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Enyaq generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 585L in the Skoda Enyaq and 300L in the MINI Aceman, giving the Skoda Enyaq a 285L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.3m to 11.1m
Based on 9.3m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.1m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Enyaq) vs 5 years / 999,999km (MINI Aceman). The Skoda Enyaq has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Skoda Enyaq if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the MINI Aceman if: You or prefer MINI's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Skoda Enyaq: Top CarSorted Score, 81 vs 77
The Skoda Enyaq comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (81 vs 77), taking 10 of 10 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: practicality (Skoda Enyaq ahead by 21), performance (Skoda Enyaq ahead by 14), energy efficiency (MINI Aceman ahead by 13). If boot space matters, the Skoda Enyaq has a clear edge. The Skoda Enyaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Skoda Enyaq and MINI Aceman?
The Skoda Enyaq is the cheapest at $59,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MINI Aceman by $1,000.
Which has the longest driving range?
The Skoda Enyaq has the most range at 547km (WLTP).
Which charges fastest?
The Skoda Enyaq accepts the highest DC charging at up to 175kW.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched on crash rating: Skoda Enyaq and MINI Aceman all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Skoda Enyaq has the largest boot at 585L with the seats up.
Which can tow the most?
The Skoda Enyaq has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Skoda Enyaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Skoda Enyaq makes the most power at 210kW. The Skoda Enyaq is quickest to 100km/h in 6.7s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
