CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSkoda Kamiq vs Renault Duster
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Kamiq vs Renault Duster

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSkodaRenault
Price (RRP)$30,900$31,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power85kW113kW
0-100 km/h10.1s10.2s
Fuel Economy5.5 L/100km6.5 L/100km
Boot Space400L472L
Towing1,200kg1,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data3 Stars

Track the Skoda Kamiq & Renault Duster

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Skoda Kamiq starts from $30,900 before on-road costs, while the Renault Duster opens at $31,990. That makes the Skoda Kamiq the more affordable entry point by $1,090.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. Estimated driveaway prices sit around $33,990 for the Skoda Kamiq and $34,990 for the Renault Duster.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Kamiq by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Skoda Kamiq features a 8.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Renault Duster gets a 10.1-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Kamiq uses a Petrol producing 85kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed dsg to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.1 seconds.

The Renault Duster responds with a Petrol making 113kW and 270Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.

The Renault Duster has the clear power advantage at 113kW vs 85kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Kamiq is 0.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Kamiq measures 4,241mm long on a 2,651mm wheelbase, 104mm shorter than the Renault Duster at 4,345mm (2,657mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Renault Duster generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 400L in the Skoda Kamiq and 472L in the Renault Duster, giving the Renault Duster a 72L advantage.

For towing, the Renault Duster leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 10.9m

TightestSkoda Kamiq 85TSI SelectTightest turn at 10.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Skoda Kamiq 85TSI Select
10.8mTighter
Best
Renault Duster Evolution 4x2
10.9m
Worst
Skoda Kamiq 85TSI Select
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Renault Duster Evolution 4x2
10.9m · Good

Based on 10.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSkoda KamiqTightest turn at 10.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Skoda KamiqTightest10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Renault Duster10.9 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,568/year for the Skoda Kamiq and $1,853/year for the Renault Duster. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Kamiq.

Estimated annual total: $1,568 (Skoda Kamiq) vs $1,853 (Renault Duster). The Skoda Kamiq saves you roughly $285 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kamiq) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Duster). The Skoda Kamiq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Kamiq if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Renault Duster if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Kamiq takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Skoda Kamiq will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Renault Duster has a clear edge. The Skoda Kamiq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Skoda Kamiq and Renault Duster?

The Skoda Kamiq is the cheapest at $30,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Renault Duster by $1,090.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Kamiq uses the least fuel at 5.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Renault Duster all hold a 3-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Renault Duster has the largest boot at 472L.

Which can tow the most?

The Renault Duster has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Kamiq has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Renault Duster makes the most power at 113kW. The Skoda Kamiq is quickest to 100km/h in 10.1s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs