CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSsangyong Stavic vs Volkswagen Caddy
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ssangyong Stavic vs Volkswagen Caddy

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular People Movers compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Ssangyong Stavic: we're still completing price, height, 0-100km/h and warranty.

Volkswagen Caddy: we're still completing kerb weight, 0-100km/h and ground clearance.

Blank cells below mean we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecSsangyongVolkswagen
Price (RRP)TBC$57,600
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power114kW84kW
Fuel Economy7.8 L/100km6.2 L/100km
Boot Space446L
Towing2,000kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / 0k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Ssangyong Stavic & Volkswagen Caddy

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Volkswagen Caddy counters with Apple CarPlay and wireless charging that the Ssangyong Stavic does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Ssangyong Stavic gets woven cloth upholstery while the Volkswagen Caddy offers cloth (double grid).

Drivetrain

The Ssangyong Stavic uses a D20DTR producing 114kW and 360Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed automatic to a RWD layout.

The Volkswagen Caddy responds with a Petrol I4 Turbo TSI making 84kW and 220Nm, paired to a 7-speed dual clutch (dsg) driving the front wheels.

The Ssangyong Stavic has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 84kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ssangyong Stavic measures 5,130mm long on a 3,000mm wheelbase, 277mm longer than the Volkswagen Caddy at 4,853mm (2,970mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ssangyong Stavic generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Ssangyong Stavic leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.1m to 12.2m

TightestVolkswagen Caddy Caddy TSI220 DSGTightest turn at 12.1m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Volkswagen Caddy Caddy TSI220 DSG
12.1mTighter
Best
Ssangyong Stavic S Auto
12.2m
Worst
Ssangyong Stavic S Auto
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volkswagen Caddy TSI220 DSG
12.1m · Large

Based on 12.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestVolkswagen CaddyTightest turn at 12.1m, needs the least road to swing around
Ssangyong Stavic12.2 m
Large△ 3-point
Volkswagen CaddyTightest12.1 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,223/year for the Ssangyong Stavic and $1,767/year for the Volkswagen Caddy. That is a $456 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen Caddy.

Estimated annual total: $2,223 (Ssangyong Stavic) vs $1,767 (Volkswagen Caddy). The Volkswagen Caddy saves you roughly $456 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ssangyong Stavic if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Ssangyong's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen Caddy if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ssangyong Stavic takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The Volkswagen Caddy will save you roughly $456 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ssangyong Stavic and Volkswagen Caddy?

The Volkswagen Caddy is the cheapest at $57,600 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volkswagen Caddy uses the least fuel at 6.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Volkswagen Caddy all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Ssangyong Stavic has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ssangyong Stavic makes the most power at 114kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All People Movers · Best family cars