CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSubaru Outback vs Toyota C-HR
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Subaru Outback vs Toyota C-HR

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSubaruToyota
Price (RRP)$48,990$46,940
Power137kW103kW
0-100 km/h9.9s8.2s
Fuel Economy8.6 L/100km4.7 L/100km
Boot Space975L388L
Towing2,000kg725kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Subaru Outback starts from $48,990 before on-road costs, while the Toyota C-HR opens at $46,940. That makes the Toyota C-HR the more affordable entry point by $2,050.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $53,889 and $51,634 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Toyota C-HR by roughly $5,555 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Subaru Outback and Toyota C-HR hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 88% for the Subaru Outback and 85% for the Toyota C-HR.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the Subaru Outback and 7 in the Toyota C-HR.

Feature Showdown

The Subaru Outback features a 12.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota C-HR gets a 12.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Subaru Outback stands out with panoramic roof, heated front seats and power tailgate that you will not find on the Toyota C-HR. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Subaru Outback gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Toyota C-HR offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Subaru Outback uses a Petrol producing 137kW and 254Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.9 seconds.

The Toyota C-HR responds with a Petrol making 103kW and 188Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.2 seconds.

The Subaru Outback has the clear power advantage at 137kW vs 103kW. In the real-world sprint, the Toyota C-HR is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Subaru Outback measures 4,870mm long on a 2,745mm wheelbase, 510mm longer than the Toyota C-HR at 4,360mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Subaru Outback generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 975L in the Subaru Outback and 388L in the Toyota C-HR, giving the Subaru Outback a 587L advantage.

For towing, the Subaru Outback leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 725kg. That 1,275kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 10.8m

Toyota C-HR GXL
10.4mTighter
Best
Subaru Outback AWD
10.8m
Worst
Subaru Outback
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota C-HR
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,451/year for the Subaru Outback and $1,340/year for the Toyota C-HR. That is a $1,111 annual difference in favour of the Toyota C-HR.

Estimated annual total: $2,451 (Subaru Outback) vs $1,340 (Toyota C-HR). The Toyota C-HR saves you roughly $1,111 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Subaru Outback) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota C-HR). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Subaru Outback if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Subaru's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota C-HR if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Subaru Outback and Toyota C-HR trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Toyota C-HR will save you roughly $1,111 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Subaru Outback has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Subaru Outback and Toyota C-HR?

The Toyota C-HR is the cheapest at $46,940 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Subaru Outback by $2,050.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota C-HR uses the least fuel at 4.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Subaru Outback and Toyota C-HR all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Subaru Outback has the largest boot at 975L.

Which can tow the most?

The Subaru Outback has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Subaru Outback makes the most power at 137kW. The Toyota C-HR is quickest to 100km/h in 8.2s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs