CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSuzuki Kizashi vs Hyundai i30 Sedan
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki Kizashi vs Hyundai i30 Sedan

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSuzukiHyundai
Price (RRP)TBC$29,250
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power131kW110kW
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km6.1 L/100km
Boot Space461L474L
Towing1,700kg1,100kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars3 Stars

Track the Suzuki Kizashi & Hyundai i30 Sedan

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

The Suzuki Kizashi holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 3 stars for the Hyundai i30 Sedan.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Hyundai i30 Sedan packs more ADAS features with 4 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Suzuki Kizashi.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Hyundai i30 Sedan counters with Apple CarPlay that the Suzuki Kizashi does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki Kizashi uses a 2.4L J24B petrol, DOHC 16v with variable valve timing, multipoint injection producing 131kW and 230Nm of torque, sent through a cvt automatic to a FWD layout.

The Hyundai i30 Sedan responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 180Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels.

The Suzuki Kizashi has the clear power advantage at 131kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki Kizashi measures 4,650mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 60mm shorter than the Hyundai i30 Sedan at 4,710mm (2,720mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Hyundai i30 Sedan generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 461L in the Suzuki Kizashi and 474L in the Hyundai i30 Sedan, giving the Hyundai i30 Sedan a 13L advantage.

For towing, the Suzuki Kizashi leads with a 1,700kg braked capacity vs 1,100kg. That 600kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.0m

TightestHyundai i30 Sedan ActiveTightest turn at 10.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Hyundai i30 Sedan Active
10.8mTighter
Best
Suzuki Kizashi XL 2.4 CVT
11.0m
Worst
Suzuki Kizashi XL 2.4 CVT
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Hyundai i30 Sedan Active
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestHyundai i30 SedanTightest turn at 10.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Suzuki Kizashi11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Hyundai i30 SedanTightest10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the Suzuki Kizashi and $1,739/year for the Hyundai i30 Sedan. That is a $513 annual difference in favour of the Hyundai i30 Sedan.

Estimated annual total: $2,252 (Suzuki Kizashi) vs $1,739 (Hyundai i30 Sedan). The Hyundai i30 Sedan saves you roughly $513 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Kizashi) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai i30 Sedan). The Hyundai i30 Sedan has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki Kizashi if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Hyundai i30 Sedan if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Suzuki Kizashi and Hyundai i30 Sedan trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Hyundai i30 Sedan will save you roughly $513 a year in fuel. The Hyundai i30 Sedan adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Suzuki Kizashi and Hyundai i30 Sedan?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan is the cheapest at $29,250 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan uses the least fuel at 6.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

The Suzuki Kizashi has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan has the largest boot at 474L.

Which can tow the most?

The Suzuki Kizashi has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,700kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Suzuki Kizashi makes the most power at 131kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars