Suzuki S-Cross vs Volkswagen T-Roc
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Suzuki S-Cross
From $43,490
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
103kW
6.2 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
430L

Volkswagen T-Roc
From $41,990
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
110kW
6.3 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
445L
Track the Suzuki S-Cross & Volkswagen T-Roc
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Suzuki S-Cross starts from $43,490 before on-road costs, while the Volkswagen T-Roc opens at $41,990. That makes the Volkswagen T-Roc the more affordable entry point by $1,500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $47,839 and $46,189 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Suzuki S-Cross features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Volkswagen T-Roc gets a 8-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Suzuki S-Cross stands out with power tailgate that you will not find on the Volkswagen T-Roc. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Suzuki S-Cross gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Volkswagen T-Roc offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The Suzuki S-Cross uses a Petrol producing 103kW and 220Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The Volkswagen T-Roc responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.7 seconds.
The Volkswagen T-Roc has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 103kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volkswagen T-Roc is 1.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Suzuki S-Cross measures 4,305mm long on a 2,600mm wheelbase, 54mm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc at 4,251mm (2,603mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volkswagen T-Roc generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 430L in the Suzuki S-Cross and 445L in the Volkswagen T-Roc, giving the Volkswagen T-Roc a 15L advantage.
For towing, the Volkswagen T-Roc leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.8m to 11.1m
Based on 10.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.1m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,767/year for the Suzuki S-Cross and $1,796/year for the Volkswagen T-Roc. That is a $29 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki S-Cross.
Estimated annual total: $1,767 (Suzuki S-Cross) vs $1,796 (Volkswagen T-Roc). The Suzuki S-Cross saves you roughly $29 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki S-Cross) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen T-Roc). The Volkswagen T-Roc has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Suzuki S-Cross if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Volkswagen T-Roc if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Volkswagen T-Roc takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Suzuki S-Cross will save you roughly $29 a year in fuel. The Volkswagen T-Roc adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Suzuki S-Cross and Volkswagen T-Roc?
The Volkswagen T-Roc is the cheapest at $41,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki S-Cross by $1,500.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki S-Cross uses the least fuel at 6.2L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Suzuki S-Cross all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Volkswagen T-Roc has the largest boot at 445L.
Which can tow the most?
The Suzuki S-Cross has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Volkswagen T-Roc has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Volkswagen T-Roc makes the most power at 110kW. The Volkswagen T-Roc is quickest to 100km/h in 8.7s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!









