CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Suzuki S-Cross vs Volkswagen T-Roc
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki S-Cross vs Volkswagen T-Roc

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 8 Oct 2026, price 27 Oct 2026

Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Suzuki S-CrossTurbo 2WD7?05
Volkswagen T-RocStyle 110TSI8004

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

Specifications in progress

Suzuki S-Cross: we're still completing 0-100km/h, warranty and turning circle.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecSuzukiVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$33,650 est.$41,990
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$33,650est. RRP

  • no option data for this car

$41,990RRP

  • with the Suzuki S-Cross's standard kit: at least $41,990 (1 option priced only inside packages)
    1 added option
    • Heated Front Seats: priced only inside the Leather package

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power103kW110kW
0-100 km/h—8.7s
Fuel Economy5.9 L/100km6.3 L/100km
Boot (seats up)430L445L
Towing1,500kg1,500kg
Warranty—5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Suzuki S-Cross & Volkswagen T-Roc

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Suzuki S-Cross starts from $33,650 (our estimated RRP; the brand lists drive-away prices only) before on-road costs, while the Volkswagen T-Roc opens at $41,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $37,015 and $46,189 respectively.

Matching the Suzuki S-Cross's standard equipment means adding extra-cost options to the Volkswagen T-Roc, and one is priced only inside a package whose price the manufacturer doesn't publish, so the true gap is larger than the sticker difference suggests.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Suzuki S-Cross

  • REC-001260 · published 21 Apr 2016Magyar Suzuki Corporation has identified a possibility that during production the front seat back may have been assembled with incorrect stitch seam spacing, outside of the manufacturing control value around the area of the side airbag.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
  • REC-001259 · published 20 Apr 2016Magyar Suzuki Corporation has identified a possibility that during production the front seat back may have been assembled with incorrect stitch seam spacing, outside of the manufacturing control value around the area of the side airbag.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
  • REC-001258 · published 22 Feb 2016The rear axle bolts may loosen, come away or break, potentially causing the vehicle to become inoperable.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
  • 1 more on the model page.

Volkswagen T-Roc

  • REC-006631 · published 18 Jun 2026Due to a software issue, the Instrument Panel Cluster (IPC) may fail to illuminate the visual vehicle speed, fuel level and other critical safety information.Year range on the notice: 2024 - 2025
  • REC-006315 · published 27 Mar 2025Due to a calibration issue, the LED Matrix HD headlights may have been adjusted incorrectly.Year range on the notice: 2024 - 2025
  • REC-005418 · published 28 Apr 2022Due to manufacturing issue, the engine compartment cover may become loose.Year range on the notice: 2021 - 2022

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Suzuki S-Cross features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the Volkswagen T-Roc gets a 8-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Suzuki S-Cross stands out with Apple CarPlay and heated front seats — features our data doesn't list for the Volkswagen T-Roc. The Volkswagen T-Roc counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, power tailgate and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Suzuki S-Cross gets fabric upholstery while the Volkswagen T-Roc offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki S-Cross lines up producing 103kW and 220Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a 2WD layout.

The Volkswagen T-Roc responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.7 seconds.

The Volkswagen T-Roc has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 103kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki S-Cross measures 4,305mm long on a 2,600mm wheelbase, 54mm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc at 4,251mm (2,603mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volkswagen T-Roc generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 430L in the Suzuki S-Cross and 445L in the Volkswagen T-Roc, giving the Volkswagen T-Roc a 15L advantage.

For towing, the Volkswagen T-Roc leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1m diameter

Average

Volkswagen T-Roc Style 110TSI
11.1m
←
Volkswagen T-Roc Style 110TSI
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
Volkswagen T-Roc Turning circle · Ø 11.1 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.9 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

✓

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

✓

Standard parking bay

1.8 m wide: fits with room

✓

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

✕

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,682/year for the Suzuki S-Cross and $1,796/year for the Volkswagen T-Roc. That is a $114 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki S-Cross.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki S-Cross if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen T-Roc if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Volkswagen T-Roc: Top CarSorted Score, 70 vs 66, but the Suzuki S-Cross is $8,340 cheaper

The Volkswagen T-Roc comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (70 vs 66), taking 2 of 3 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: reliability (Volkswagen T-Roc ahead by 9), value (Volkswagen T-Roc ahead by 7), fuel economy (Suzuki S-Cross ahead by 4). The Suzuki S-Cross will save you roughly $114 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Suzuki S-Cross and Volkswagen T-Roc?

The Suzuki S-Cross is the cheapest at $33,650 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volkswagen T-Roc by $8,340.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki S-Cross uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Suzuki S-Cross and Volkswagen T-Roc carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volkswagen T-Roc has the largest boot at 445L with the seats up (1,290L with the seats folded).

Which can tow the most?

The Suzuki S-Cross has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volkswagen T-Roc makes the most power at 110kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs