CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSuzuki S-Cross vs Volkswagen T-Roc
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki S-Cross vs Volkswagen T-Roc

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSuzukiVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$43,490$41,990
Power95kW110kW
0-100 km/h10.5s9.1s
Fuel Economy5.4 L/100km6.3 L/100km
Boot Space430L392L
Towing1,500kg1,800kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Price Breakdown

The Suzuki S-Cross starts from $43,490 before on-road costs, while the Volkswagen T-Roc opens at $41,990. That makes the Volkswagen T-Roc the more affordable entry point by $1,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $47,839 and $46,189 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki S-Cross by roughly $1,285 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Suzuki S-Cross features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Volkswagen T-Roc gets a 8-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Suzuki S-Cross stands out with power tailgate that you will not find on the Volkswagen T-Roc. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Suzuki S-Cross gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Volkswagen T-Roc offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki S-Cross uses a Petrol producing 95kW and 220Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The Volkswagen T-Roc responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.1 seconds.

The Volkswagen T-Roc has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 95kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volkswagen T-Roc is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki S-Cross measures 4,300mm long on a 2,600mm wheelbase, 49mm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc at 4,251mm (2,603mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volkswagen T-Roc generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 430L in the Suzuki S-Cross and 392L in the Volkswagen T-Roc, giving the Suzuki S-Cross a 38L advantage.

For towing, the Volkswagen T-Roc leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 10.6m

Suzuki S-Cross GLX Turbo AllGrip
10.4mTighter
Best
Volkswagen T-Roc Style 110TSI
10.6m
Worst
Suzuki S-Cross
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volkswagen T-Roc
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,539/year for the Suzuki S-Cross and $1,796/year for the Volkswagen T-Roc. That is a $257 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki S-Cross.

Estimated annual total: $1,539 (Suzuki S-Cross) vs $1,796 (Volkswagen T-Roc). The Suzuki S-Cross saves you roughly $257 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki S-Cross) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen T-Roc). The Volkswagen T-Roc has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki S-Cross if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen T-Roc if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Volkswagen T-Roc takes 5 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Suzuki S-Cross will save you roughly $257 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Suzuki S-Cross has a clear edge. The Volkswagen T-Roc adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Suzuki S-Cross and Volkswagen T-Roc?

The Volkswagen T-Roc is the cheapest at $41,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki S-Cross by $1,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki S-Cross uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Suzuki S-Cross all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Suzuki S-Cross has the largest boot at 430L.

Which can tow the most?

The Volkswagen T-Roc has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Volkswagen T-Roc has the longest warranty at 5 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volkswagen T-Roc makes the most power at 110kW. The Volkswagen T-Roc is quickest to 100km/h in 9.1s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs