Toyota GR Supra vs Nissan Z
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Coupes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Toyota GR Supra
From $87,000
Coupe
Petrol
3.0L in-line 6-cylinder turbo petrol
285kW
7.5 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
290L
Nissan Z
From $76,160
Coupe
Petrol
Petrol
298kW
10.8 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
241L
Toyota GR Supra: we're still completing warranty, ground clearance, turning circle and braked towing.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the Toyota GR Supra & Nissan Z
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Toyota GR Supra starts from $87,000 before on-road costs, while the Nissan Z opens at $76,160. That makes the Nissan Z the more affordable entry point by $10,840.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $95,700 and $83,776 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Toyota GR Supra by roughly $4,700 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Toyota GR Supra features a 8.8-inch touchscreen, while the Nissan Z gets a 8-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Toyota GR Supra stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Nissan Z. The Nissan Z counters with Apple CarPlay, heated front seats and Bose audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Toyota GR Supra uses a 3.0L in-line 6-cylinder turbo petrol producing 285kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic transmission to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.1 seconds.
The Nissan Z responds with a Petrol making 298kW and 475Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 4.6 seconds.
The Nissan Z has the clear power advantage at 298kW vs 285kW. In the real-world sprint, the Toyota GR Supra is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Toyota GR Supra measures 4,379mm long on a 2,470mm wheelbase, 1mm shorter than the Nissan Z at 4,380mm (2,550mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Nissan Z generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 290L in the Toyota GR Supra and 241L in the Nissan Z, giving the Toyota GR Supra a 49L advantage.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.0m diameter
Good
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Good
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 9.8 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: clears in one
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.8 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: swings in
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,138/year for the Toyota GR Supra and $3,078/year for the Nissan Z. That is a $940 annual difference in favour of the Toyota GR Supra.
Estimated annual total: $2,138 (Toyota GR Supra) vs $3,078 (Nissan Z). The Toyota GR Supra saves you roughly $940 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Toyota GR Supra if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Nissan Z if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Toyota GR Supra takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Toyota GR Supra will save you roughly $940 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota GR Supra has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Toyota GR Supra and Nissan Z?
The Nissan Z is the cheapest at $76,160 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota GR Supra by $10,840.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Toyota GR Supra uses the least fuel at 7.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of Toyota GR Supra and Nissan Z carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.
Which has the most boot space?
The Toyota GR Supra has the largest boot at 290L.
Which is the most powerful?
The Nissan Z makes the most power at 298kW. The Toyota GR Supra is quickest to 100km/h in 4.1s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
