CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Toyota Prado vs Volvo V50
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Toyota Prado vs Volvo V50

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 12 Aug 2026, price 6 Sep 2026

Specifications in progress

Volvo V50: we're still completing price, kerb weight, seat count, warranty and ground clearance.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecToyotaVolvo
Price (RRP)$72,500TBC
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power150kW169kW
0-100 km/h9.6s7.3s
Fuel Economy7.6 L/100km9.5 L/100km
Boot (seats up)408L417L
Towing3,500kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited—
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Toyota Prado & Volvo V50

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Toyota Prado stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the Volvo V50. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Toyota Prado uses a 2.8L 4-cyl Turbo-Diesel 48V V-Active producing 150kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.6 seconds.

The Volvo V50 lines up making 169kW and 320Nm, paired to a 5-speed geartronic automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.3 seconds.

The Volvo V50 has the clear power advantage at 169kW vs 150kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Volvo V50 is 2.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Toyota Prado measures 4,990mm long on a 2,850mm wheelbase, 468mm longer than the Volvo V50 at 4,522mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Prado generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 408L in the Toyota Prado and 417L in the Volvo V50, giving the Volvo V50 a 9L advantage.

For towing, the Toyota Prado leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 2,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 12.0m

TightestVolvo V50 T5Tightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Volvo V50 T5
10.6mTighter
Best
Toyota Prado GX Diesel
12.0m
Worst
Toyota Prado GX Diesel
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volvo V50 T5
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestVolvo V50Tightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Toyota Prado12.0 m
Average△ 3-point
Volvo V50Tightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,166/year for the Toyota Prado and $2,708/year for the Volvo V50. That is a $542 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Prado.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Toyota Prado if: You want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo V50 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota Prado comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (67 vs 36), taking 2 of 5 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Toyota Prado ahead by 53), technology (Toyota Prado ahead by 41), value (Toyota Prado ahead by 28). The Toyota Prado will save you roughly $542 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Toyota Prado and Volvo V50?

The Toyota Prado is the cheapest at $72,500 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Prado uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Toyota Prado holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Volvo V50, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volvo V50 has the largest boot at 417L with the seats up.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Prado has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volvo V50 makes the most power at 169kW. The Volvo V50 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.3s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · All Wagons · Best mid-size SUVs · Best family cars