CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Volkswagen Eos vs Toyota HiLux
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Volkswagen Eos vs Toyota HiLux

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Volkswagen Eos: we're still completing price, kerb weight and ground clearance.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecVolkswagenToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$33,990
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power155kW150kW
0-100 km/h7.8s10.2s
Fuel Economy7.7 L/100km7.3 L/100km
Boot Space205L—
Towing1,500kg2,900kg
Warranty3yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety4 Stars5 Stars

Track the Volkswagen Eos & Toyota HiLux

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

The Toyota HiLux holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Volkswagen Eos.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Toyota HiLux, against 0 on the Volkswagen Eos.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Volkswagen Eos stands out with heated front seats — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota HiLux. The Toyota HiLux counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Volkswagen Eos uses a 2.0 TSI turbo-petrol direct injection producing 155kW and 280Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed dsg to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.8 seconds.

The Toyota HiLux responds with a 2.8L 4-cyl Turbo-Diesel making 150kW and 420Nm, paired to a manual driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.

The Volkswagen Eos has the clear power advantage at 155kW vs 150kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Volkswagen Eos is 2.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Volkswagen Eos measures 4,407mm long on a 2,576mm wheelbase, 973mm shorter than the Toyota HiLux at 5,380mm (3,085mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota HiLux generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Toyota HiLux leads with a 2,900kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 1,400kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 10.9m

TightestToyota HiLux WorkMate 4x2 Single Cab ManualTightest turn at 10.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Toyota HiLux WorkMate 4x2 Single Cab Manual
10.8mTighter
Best
Volkswagen Eos 155TSI
10.9m
Worst
Volkswagen Eos 155TSI
10.9m · Good

Based on 10.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota HiLux WorkMate 4x2 Single Cab Manual
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestToyota HiLuxTightest turn at 10.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Volkswagen Eos10.9 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota HiLuxTightest10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,195/year for the Volkswagen Eos and $2,081/year for the Toyota HiLux. That is a $114 annual difference in favour of the Toyota HiLux.

Warranty: 3 years (Volkswagen Eos) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota HiLux). The Toyota HiLux has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Volkswagen Eos if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota HiLux if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota HiLux takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Toyota HiLux will save you roughly $114 a year in fuel. The Toyota HiLux adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Volkswagen Eos and Toyota HiLux?

The Toyota HiLux is the cheapest at $33,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota HiLux uses the least fuel at 7.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

The Toyota HiLux has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota HiLux has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,900kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Toyota HiLux has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volkswagen Eos makes the most power at 155kW. The Volkswagen Eos is quickest to 100km/h in 7.8s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Convertibles · All Cab Chassiss · Best family cars