CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsVolvo XC90 vs Nissan Patrol
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Volvo XC90 vs Nissan Patrol

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecVolvoNissan
Price (RRP)$97,990$90,600
Power183kW298kW
0-100 km/h6.6s6.6s
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km14.4 L/100km
Boot Space810L620L
Towing2,400kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Volvo XC90 & Nissan Patrol

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. No dealer spin, unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Volvo XC90 starts from $97,990 before on-road costs, while the Nissan Patrol opens at $90,600. That makes the Nissan Patrol the more affordable entry point by $7,390.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $107,789 and $99,660 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volvo XC90 by roughly $8,975 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Volvo XC90 features a 11.2-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Nissan Patrol gets a 12.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Volvo XC90 stands out with head-up display, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate and Bowers & Wilkins audio that you will not find on the Nissan Patrol. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Volvo XC90 uses a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid B5 producing 183kW and 350Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.6 seconds.

The Nissan Patrol responds with a Petrol making 298kW and 560Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.6 seconds.

The Nissan Patrol has the clear power advantage at 298kW vs 183kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Volvo XC90 measures 4,953mm long on a 2,984mm wheelbase, 222mm shorter than the Nissan Patrol at 5,175mm (3,075mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Nissan Patrol generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 810L in the Volvo XC90 and 620L in the Nissan Patrol, giving the Volvo XC90 a 190L advantage. The Nissan Patrol seats 8 vs 7.

For towing, the Nissan Patrol leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,400kg. That 1,100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.4m to 12.5m

Volvo XC90 Plus B5 Bright
12.4mTighter
Best
Nissan Patrol Ti
12.5m
Worst
Volvo XC90 Plus B5 Bright
12.4m · Large

Based on 12.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Nissan Patrol Ti
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Volvo XC90 and $4,104/year for the Nissan Patrol. That is a $1,795 annual difference in favour of the Volvo XC90.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Volvo XC90) vs $4,104 (Nissan Patrol). The Volvo XC90 saves you roughly $1,795 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC90) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan Patrol). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Volvo XC90 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Nissan Patrol if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Nissan Patrol takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Volvo XC90 will save you roughly $1,795 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volvo XC90 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Volvo XC90 and Nissan Patrol?

The Nissan Patrol is the cheapest at $90,600 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volvo XC90 by $7,390.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volvo XC90 uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Volvo XC90 and Nissan Patrol carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volvo XC90 has the largest boot at 810L.

Which can tow the most?

The Nissan Patrol has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Nissan Patrol makes the most power at 298kW.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs