CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsVolvo XC90 vs Toyota LandCruiser 300
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Volvo XC90 vs Toyota LandCruiser 300

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecVolvoToyota
Price (RRP)$97,990$97,990
Power183kW227kW
0-100 km/h6.6s8.6s
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km8.9 L/100km
Boot Space810L700L
Towing2,400kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Volvo XC90 & Toyota LandCruiser 300

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. No dealer spin, unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Volvo XC90 starts from $97,990 before on-road costs, while the Toyota LandCruiser 300 opens at $97,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $107,789 and $107,789 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volvo XC90 by roughly $1,140 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Volvo XC90 features a 11.2-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota LandCruiser 300 gets a 8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Volvo XC90 stands out with head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate and Bowers & Wilkins audio that you will not find on the Toyota LandCruiser 300. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Volvo XC90 gets leather upholstery while the Toyota LandCruiser 300 offers cloth. Climate control is 4-zone in the Volvo XC90 and 2-zone in the Toyota LandCruiser 300.

Drivetrain

The Volvo XC90 uses a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid B5 producing 183kW and 350Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.6 seconds.

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 responds with a Diesel Twin-Turbo V6 making 227kW and 700Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.6 seconds.

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the clear power advantage at 227kW vs 183kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volvo XC90 is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Volvo XC90 measures 4,953mm long on a 2,984mm wheelbase, 27mm shorter than the Toyota LandCruiser 300 at 4,980mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volvo XC90 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 810L in the Volvo XC90 and 700L in the Toyota LandCruiser 300, giving the Volvo XC90 a 110L advantage. The Volvo XC90 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 300 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,400kg. That 1,100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m to 12.4m

Toyota LandCruiser 300 GX
11.8mTighter
Best
Volvo XC90 Plus B5 Bright
12.4m
Worst
Volvo XC90 Plus B5 Bright
12.4m · Large

Based on 12.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota LandCruiser 300 GX
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Volvo XC90 and $2,537/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 300. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the Volvo XC90.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Volvo XC90) vs $2,537 (Toyota LandCruiser 300). The Volvo XC90 saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC90) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 300). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Volvo XC90 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 300 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Volvo XC90 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Volvo XC90 will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volvo XC90 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Volvo XC90 and Toyota LandCruiser 300?

The Volvo XC90 is the cheapest at $97,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volvo XC90 uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Toyota LandCruiser 300 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volvo XC90 has the largest boot at 810L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 makes the most power at 227kW. The Volvo XC90 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.6s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs