KGM Rexton vs Ford Everest
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The KGM Rexton starts from $50,000 before on-road costs, while the Ford Everest opens at $59,490. That makes the KGM Rexton the more affordable entry point by $9,490.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $55,000 and $65,439 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Ford Everest by roughly $2,140 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the KGM Rexton and Ford Everest hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Ford Everest packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the KGM Rexton.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the KGM Rexton and 9 in the Ford Everest.
Feature Showdown
The KGM Rexton features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Ford Everest gets a 10.1-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The KGM Rexton stands out with power tailgate and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Ford Everest. The Ford Everest counters with wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The KGM Rexton uses a Turbo DDi Diesel producing 149kW and 441Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.
The Ford Everest responds with a Diesel Bi-Turbo making 154kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.1 seconds.
The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 154kW vs 149kW. In the real-world sprint, the Ford Everest is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The KGM Rexton measures 4,850mm long on a 2,865mm wheelbase, 128mm shorter than the Ford Everest at 4,978mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 236L in the KGM Rexton and 259L in the Ford Everest, giving the Ford Everest a 23L advantage. The KGM Rexton seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Ford Everest leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.6m to 11.8m
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,480/year for the KGM Rexton and $2,052/year for the Ford Everest. That is a $428 annual difference in favour of the Ford Everest.
Estimated annual total: $2,480 (KGM Rexton) vs $2,052 (Ford Everest). The Ford Everest saves you roughly $428 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Rexton) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest). The KGM Rexton has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the KGM Rexton if: You want the lower entry price, value a longer warranty, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Ford Everest takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Ford Everest will save you roughly $428 a year in fuel. The KGM Rexton adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, KGM Rexton and Ford Everest?
The KGM Rexton is the cheapest at $50,000 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford Everest by $9,490.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Ford Everest uses the least fuel at 7.2L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — KGM Rexton and Ford Everest all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Ford Everest has the largest boot at 259L.
Which can tow the most?
The KGM Rexton has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The KGM Rexton has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Ford Everest makes the most power at 154kW. The Ford Everest is quickest to 100km/h in 10.1s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
