CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-70 vs BMW X2
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-70 vs BMW X2

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaBMW
Price (RRP)$76,720$75,900
Power254kW150kW
0-100 km/h6.8s
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km7.5 L/100km
Boot Space598L410L
Towing2,500kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-70 starts from $76,720 before on-road costs, while the BMW X2 opens at $75,900. That makes the BMW X2 the more affordable entry point by $820.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $84,392 and $83,490 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-70 and BMW X2 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mazda CX-70 packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the BMW X2.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mazda CX-70 and 6 in the BMW X2. The Mazda CX-70 adds a 360-degree camera that the BMW X2 misses.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Mazda CX-70 stands out with head-up display that you will not find on the BMW X2. The BMW X2 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, power tailgate and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-70 uses a Petrol producing 254kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout.

The BMW X2 responds with a Petrol making 150kW and 300Nm, paired to a auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.8 seconds.

The Mazda CX-70 has the clear power advantage at 254kW vs 150kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-70 measures 5,120mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 566mm longer than the BMW X2 at 4,554mm (2,692mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-70 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 598L in the Mazda CX-70 and 410L in the BMW X2, giving the Mazda CX-70 a 188L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-70 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.3m to 11.8m

BMW X2 xDrive20i M Sport
11.3mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-70 G50e GT
11.8m
Worst
Mazda CX-70
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
BMW X2
11.3m · Average

Based on 11.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Mazda CX-70 and $2,138/year for the BMW X2. That is a $171 annual difference in favour of the BMW X2.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Mazda CX-70) vs $2,138 (BMW X2). The BMW X2 saves you roughly $171 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-70) vs 5 years / 999,999km (BMW X2). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-70 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the BMW X2 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-70 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The BMW X2 will save you roughly $171 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-70 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-70 and BMW X2?

The BMW X2 is the cheapest at $75,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-70 by $820.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BMW X2 uses the least fuel at 7.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-70 and BMW X2 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-70 has the largest boot at 598L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-70 makes the most power at 254kW.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs