CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-30 vs Audi Q2
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-30 vs Audi Q2

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaAudi
Price (RRP)$29,990$49,400
Power114kW110kW
0-100 km/h10.9s8.8s
Fuel Economy6 L/100km6.1 L/100km
Boot Space350L356L
Towing1,000kg1,200kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-30 starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the Audi Q2 opens at $49,400. That makes the Mazda CX-30 the more affordable entry point by $19,410.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $54,340 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-30 features a 8.8-inch touchscreen, while the Audi Q2 gets a 8.8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Audi Q2 counters with power tailgate, Bang & Olufsen audio and ambient lighting that the Mazda CX-30 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-30 uses a Petrol producing 114kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.

The Audi Q2 responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a s tronic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.8 seconds.

The Mazda CX-30 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Audi Q2 is 2.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-30 measures 4,395mm long on a 2,655mm wheelbase, 187mm longer than the Audi Q2 at 4,208mm (2,601mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-30 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 350L in the Mazda CX-30 and 356L in the Audi Q2, giving the Audi Q2 a 6L advantage.

For towing, the Audi Q2 leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.5m to 10.6m

Audi Q2 35 TFSI
10.5mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-30 G20 Pure
10.6m
Worst
Mazda CX-30
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Audi Q2
10.5m · Good

Based on 10.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-30 and $1,739/year for the Audi Q2. That is a $29 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-30.

Estimated annual total: $1,710 (Mazda CX-30) vs $1,739 (Audi Q2). The Mazda CX-30 saves you roughly $29 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-30) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Audi Q2). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Audi Q2 if: You need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Mazda CX-30 and Audi Q2 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Mazda CX-30 will save you roughly $29 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-30 and Audi Q2?

The Mazda CX-30 is the cheapest at $29,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Audi Q2 by $19,410.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-30 uses the least fuel at 6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-30 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Audi Q2 has the largest boot at 356L.

Which can tow the most?

The Audi Q2 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-30 makes the most power at 114kW. The Audi Q2 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.8s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs