Renault Arkana vs GWM Tank 300
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Renault Arkana starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the GWM Tank 300 opens at $49,990. That makes the Renault Arkana the more affordable entry point by $10,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $54,989 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Renault Arkana by roughly $6,130 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Renault Arkana and GWM Tank 300 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 96% for the Renault Arkana and 88% for the GWM Tank 300.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Renault Arkana and 6 in the GWM Tank 300.
Feature Showdown
The Renault Arkana features a 9.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the GWM Tank 300 gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Renault Arkana stands out with wireless charging that you will not find on the GWM Tank 300. The GWM Tank 300 counters with panoramic roof. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Renault Arkana uses a Petrol producing 105kW and 205Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.4 seconds.
The GWM Tank 300 responds with a Petrol making 167kW and 387Nm, paired to a auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.
The GWM Tank 300 has the clear power advantage at 167kW vs 105kW. In the real-world sprint, the Renault Arkana is 0.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Renault Arkana measures 4,568mm long on a 2,720mm wheelbase, 147mm shorter than the GWM Tank 300 at 4,715mm (2,750mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Tank 300 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 430L in the Renault Arkana and 550L in the GWM Tank 300, giving the GWM Tank 300 a 120L advantage.
For towing, the GWM Tank 300 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 800kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.8m to 12.0m
Based on 10.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,482/year for the Renault Arkana and $2,708/year for the GWM Tank 300. That is a $1,226 annual difference in favour of the Renault Arkana.
Estimated annual total: $1,482 (Renault Arkana) vs $2,708 (GWM Tank 300). The Renault Arkana saves you roughly $1,226 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Arkana) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 300). The GWM Tank 300 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Renault Arkana if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the GWM Tank 300 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The GWM Tank 300 takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Renault Arkana will save you roughly $1,226 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Tank 300 has a clear edge. The GWM Tank 300 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Renault Arkana and GWM Tank 300?
The Renault Arkana is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Tank 300 by $10,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Renault Arkana uses the least fuel at 5.2L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Renault Arkana and GWM Tank 300 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The GWM Tank 300 has the largest boot at 550L.
Which can tow the most?
The GWM Tank 300 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The GWM Tank 300 has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The GWM Tank 300 makes the most power at 167kW. The Renault Arkana is quickest to 100km/h in 9.4s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
