CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Alfa Romeo 4C vs MG Cyberster
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Alfa Romeo 4C vs MG Cyberster

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Convertibles compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 12 Aug 2026, price 8 Sep 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Alfa Romeo 4CSpider1?011
MG Cyberster77kWh AWD6?06

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

Specifications in progress

Alfa Romeo 4C: we're still completing price, kerb weight, ground clearance and turning circle.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecAlfa RomeoMG
Price (RRP)TBC$99,900
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

No price

  • no option data for this car

$99,900RRP

  • with the Alfa Romeo 4C's standard kit: $99,900 (nothing to add)

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typePremium Unleaded PetrolElectric
Range—519km
Battery—77 kWh
Power177kW375kW
0-100 km/h4.5s3.2s
Max DC Charge—144kW
10-80% Charge Time—25 min
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km—
Boot (seats up)—249L
Warranty3yr / 150k km10yr / 250k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Alfa Romeo 4C & MG Cyberster

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Alfa Romeo 4C

  • REC-000001 · published 28 Jun 2019Some vehicles may be affected due to an incorrect software file, which may allow the driver to deactivate the passenger side airbag.Year range on the notice: 2012 - 2019
  • REC-000003 · published 22 Jun 2015The passenger compartment interior window does not have the required markings, as required by the Australian Design Rules for Safety Glazing Material.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range

MG Cyberster

None open on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

74kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 11m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 144kW · 0–80%

31 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC, 144kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The MG Cyberster counters with Apple CarPlay, head-up display and Bose audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Alfa Romeo 4C lines up producing 177kW and 350Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed dual-clutch automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.5 seconds.

The MG Cyberster responds with a Electric Motor making 375kW and 725Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 3.2 seconds.

The MG Cyberster has the clear power advantage at 375kW vs 177kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the MG Cyberster is 1.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Alfa Romeo 4C measures 3,990mm long on a 2,380mm wheelbase, 545mm shorter than the MG Cyberster at 4,535mm (2,690mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG Cyberster generally means more rear legroom.

0

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 3 years / 150,000km (Alfa Romeo 4C) vs 10 years / 250,000km (MG Cyberster). The MG Cyberster has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Alfa Romeo 4C if: You or prefer Alfa Romeo's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the MG Cyberster if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The CarSorted Score calls this a draw (51 vs 66). The Alfa Romeo 4C and MG Cyberster trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The MG Cyberster adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Alfa Romeo 4C and MG Cyberster?

The MG Cyberster is the cheapest at $99,900 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Alfa Romeo 4C uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Alfa Romeo 4C and MG Cyberster carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG Cyberster has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG Cyberster makes the most power at 375kW. The MG Cyberster is quickest to 100km/h in 3.2s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Convertibles · Best family cars · Best electric cars