CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAlfa Romeo Junior vs Mazda CX-60
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Alfa Romeo Junior vs Mazda CX-60

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAlfa RomeoMazda
Price (RRP)$45,900$45,640
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power107kW138kW
0-100 km/h8.9s7.4s
Fuel Economy4.1 L/100km7.5 L/100km
Boot Space415L570L
Towing500kg1,800kg
Warranty5yr / 150k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Alfa Romeo Junior & Mazda CX-60

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Alfa Romeo Junior starts from $45,900 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-60 opens at $45,640. That makes the Mazda CX-60 the more affordable entry point by $260.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $50,490 and $50,204 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Alfa Romeo Junior by roughly $4,845 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Alfa Romeo Junior features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-60 gets a 10.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Alfa Romeo Junior stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, power tailgate and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mazda CX-60. The Mazda CX-60 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Alfa Romeo Junior uses a Petrol MHEV producing 107kW and 230Nm of torque, sent through a dct to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-60 responds with a Petrol making 138kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.4 seconds.

The Mazda CX-60 has the clear power advantage at 138kW vs 107kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-60 is 1.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Alfa Romeo Junior measures 4,170mm long on a 2,557mm wheelbase, 570mm shorter than the Mazda CX-60 at 4,740mm (2,870mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 415L in the Alfa Romeo Junior and 570L in the Mazda CX-60, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 155L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-60 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 500kg. That 1,300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 10.8m

TightestAlfa Romeo Junior IbridaTightest turn at 10.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Alfa Romeo Junior Ibrida
10.8mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-60 G25 Pure
10.8m
Best
Alfa Romeo Junior Ibrida
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-60 G25 Pure
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestAlfa Romeo JuniorTightest turn at 10.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Alfa Romeo JuniorTightest10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Mazda CX-6010.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,169/year for the Alfa Romeo Junior and $2,138/year for the Mazda CX-60. That is a $969 annual difference in favour of the Alfa Romeo Junior.

Estimated annual total: $1,169 (Alfa Romeo Junior) vs $2,138 (Mazda CX-60). The Alfa Romeo Junior saves you roughly $969 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 150,000km (Alfa Romeo Junior) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Alfa Romeo Junior if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Alfa Romeo's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-60 takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Alfa Romeo Junior will save you roughly $969 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-60 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Alfa Romeo Junior and Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is the cheapest at $45,640 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Alfa Romeo Junior by $260.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Alfa Romeo Junior uses the least fuel at 4.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-60 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-60 has the largest boot at 570L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-60 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-60 makes the most power at 138kW. The Mazda CX-60 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.4s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best mid-size SUVs