CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAudi Q4 e-tron vs Cadillac Optiq
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Cadillac Optiq

Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAudiCadillac
Price (RRP)$84,900$80,000
Fuel typeElectricElectric
Range (WLTP)470km425km
Battery82 kWh75 kWh
Power210kW224kW
0-100 km/h6.7s6.3s
Max DC Charge175kW110kW
10-80% Charge Time28 min35 min
Boot Space520L744L
Towing1,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Audi Q4 e-tron & Cadillac Optiq

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Audi Q4 e-tron starts from $84,900 before on-road costs, while the Cadillac Optiq opens at $80,000. That makes the Cadillac Optiq the more affordable entry point by $4,900.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $93,390 and $88,000 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

77kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 14m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 175kW · 0–80%

26 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 175kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

105.2kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 41m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 110kW · 0–80%

57 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 110kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Audi Q4 e-tron features a 11.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Cadillac Optiq gets a 33-inch display and 33-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Audi Q4 e-tron stands out with Bang & Olufsen audio that you will not find on the Cadillac Optiq. The Cadillac Optiq counters with head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, ventilated seats and AKG audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Audi Q4 e-tron gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Cadillac Optiq offers leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Audi Q4 e-tron and 2-zone in the Cadillac Optiq.

Drivetrain

The Audi Q4 e-tron uses a Electric producing 210kW and 545Nm of torque, sent through a single-speed (two-stage planetary) to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.7 seconds.

The Cadillac Optiq responds with a Electric making 224kW and 480Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.3 seconds.

The Cadillac Optiq has the clear power advantage at 224kW vs 210kW. In the real-world sprint, the Cadillac Optiq is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 82kWh (Audi Q4 e-tron) vs 75kWh (Cadillac Optiq), giving WLTP ranges of 470km and 425km. DC fast charging peaks at 175kW (Audi Q4 e-tron) vs 110kW (Cadillac Optiq).

Space & Comfort

The Audi Q4 e-tron measures 4,588mm long on a 2,764mm wheelbase, 232mm shorter than the Cadillac Optiq at 4,820mm (2,954mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Cadillac Optiq generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 520L in the Audi Q4 e-tron and 744L in the Cadillac Optiq, giving the Cadillac Optiq a 224L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.8m

TightestAudi Q4 e-tron 45 e-tronTightest turn at 11.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Audi Q4 e-tron 45 e-tron
11.2mTighter
Best
Cadillac Optiq Sport AWD
11.8m
Worst
Audi Q4 e-tron 45 e-tron
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Cadillac Optiq Sport AWD
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestAudi Q4 e-tronTightest turn at 11.2m, needs the least road to swing around
Audi Q4 e-tronTightest11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Cadillac Optiq11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Audi Q4 e-tron) vs 5 years / 150,000km (Cadillac Optiq). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Audi Q4 e-tron if: You or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Cadillac Optiq if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Cadillac's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Audi Q4 e-tron and Cadillac Optiq trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the Cadillac Optiq has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Audi Q4 e-tron and Cadillac Optiq?

The Cadillac Optiq is the cheapest at $80,000 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Audi Q4 e-tron by $4,900.

Which has the longest driving range?

The Audi Q4 e-tron has the most range at 524km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The Audi Q4 e-tron accepts the highest DC charging at up to 175kW.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Audi Q4 e-tron all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Cadillac Optiq has the largest boot at 744L.

Which can tow the most?

The Audi Q4 e-tron has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Cadillac Optiq makes the most power at 224kW. The Cadillac Optiq is quickest to 100km/h in 6.3s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs