Audi RSQ8 vs Mazda CX-60

Price and cost per week

Safety Rundown

We hold no ANCAP data for the Audi RSQ8. With no pair of ratings to compare, the active-safety features in the spec table above are the fairer comparison.

Recalls on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Audi RSQ8 features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-60 gets a 10.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Audi RSQ8 stands out with Apple CarPlay, panoramic roof, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate and Bang & Olufsen audio — features our data doesn't list for the Mazda CX-60. The Mazda CX-60 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Audi RSQ8 gets leather upholstery while the Mazda CX-60 offers cloth. Climate control is 3-zone in the Audi RSQ8 and 2-zone in the Mazda CX-60.

Drivetrain

The Audi RSQ8 uses a Petrol producing 471kW and 850Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed auto to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.6 seconds.

The Mazda CX-60 responds with a Petrol making 138kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.4 seconds.

The Audi RSQ8 has the clear power advantage at 471kW vs 138kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Audi RSQ8 is 3.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Audi RSQ8 measures 5,012mm long on a 2,998mm wheelbase, 272mm longer than the Mazda CX-60 at 4,740mm (2,870mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Audi RSQ8 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 605L in the Audi RSQ8 and 570L in the Mazda CX-60, giving the Audi RSQ8 a 35L advantage.

For towing, the Audi RSQ8 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 1,700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

The Mazda CX-60 turns in a 10.8 m circle, kerb to kerb; the Audi RSQ8's turning circle is not on our record.

Cost to own

At 15,000 km a year, fuel for the Audi RSQ8 costs about $3,477 a year (12.2 L/100km) and fuel for the Mazda CX-60 about $2,138 a year (7.5 L/100km), at $1.90 a litre and 32c a kWh. That is $1,339 a year less for the Mazda CX-60.

Warranty: 5 years / Unlimited (Audi RSQ8) and 5 years / Unlimited (Mazda CX-60).

Where each one leads

The Audi RSQ8: more power (471kW against 138kW), the bigger boot with the seats up (605L against 570L) and the higher braked towing limit (3,500kg against 1,800kg).

The Mazda CX-60: the lower starting price ($45,640 against $257,227) and lower fuel or energy costs on our assumptions ($2,138 a year against $3,477).

The Verdict

Mazda CX-60 scores higher, 75 vs 58

The Mazda CX-60 scores 75 to the Audi RSQ8's 58 on the CarSorted Score, and leads 2 of the 6 spec rows that separate them, at the lower price. The biggest gaps: performance (Audi RSQ8 ahead by 47 points), value (Mazda CX-60 ahead by 44 points), fuel economy (Mazda CX-60 ahead by 43 points). At 15,000 km a year, fuel for the Mazda CX-60 costs about $1,339 less (7.5 L/100km against 12.2 L/100km, at $1.90 a litre). Boot space with the seats up: 605L in the Audi RSQ8, 570L in the Mazda CX-60.

Common questions