CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBentley Continental GT vs GWM ORA
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Bentley Continental GT vs GWM ORA

Two electric Sedans go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecBentleyGWM
Price (RRP)TBC$31,990
Fuel typePlug-in HybridElectric
Range (WLTP)80km347km
Battery25.9 kWh57.7 kWh
Electric range80km
Power500kW126kW
0-100 km/h3.7s8.4s
Max DC Charge80kW
10-80% Charge Time35 min
Fuel Economy12.7 kWh/100km
Boot Space260L228L
Warranty3yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Bentley Continental GT & GWM ORA

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

25.9kWh usable

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

59kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

57 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 80kW · 0–80%

44 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (6.6kW AC, 80kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Bentley Continental GT stands out with head-up display that you will not find on the GWM ORA. The GWM ORA counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Bentley Continental GT gets nappa leather upholstery while the GWM ORA offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Bentley Continental GT runs a pure electric powertrain producing 500kW and 930Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed dual-clutch automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.7 seconds.

The GWM ORA responds with a Electric making 126kW and 250Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.4 seconds.

The Bentley Continental GT has the clear power advantage at 500kW vs 126kW. In the real-world sprint, the Bentley Continental GT is 4.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 25.9kWh (Bentley Continental GT) vs 57.7kWh (GWM ORA), giving WLTP ranges of 80km and 347km.

Space & Comfort

The Bentley Continental GT measures 4,895mm long on a 2,851mm wheelbase, 660mm longer than the GWM ORA at 4,235mm (2,650mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Bentley Continental GT generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 260L in the Bentley Continental GT and 228L in the GWM ORA, giving the Bentley Continental GT a 32L advantage. The GWM ORA seats 5 vs 4.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m diameter

Average

GWM ORA Lux
11.2m
GWM ORA Lux
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator — U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
GWM ORA Turning circle · Ø 11.2 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 10.0 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m — 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m — 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.8 m wide — fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m — swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m — no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 3 years (Bentley Continental GT) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM ORA). The GWM ORA has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Bentley Continental GT if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Bentley's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GWM ORA if: You value a longer warranty, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Bentley Continental GT and GWM ORA trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the Bentley Continental GT has a clear edge. The GWM ORA adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Bentley Continental GT and GWM ORA?

The GWM ORA is the cheapest at $31,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Bentley Continental GT uses the least fuel at 12.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — GWM ORA all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Bentley Continental GT has the largest boot at 260L.

Which has the best warranty?

The GWM ORA has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Bentley Continental GT makes the most power at 500kW. The Bentley Continental GT is quickest to 100km/h in 3.7s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best electric cars