CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBMW XM vs Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BMW XM vs Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV

Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecBMWMercedes-Benz
Price (RRP)$309,900$225,900
Fuel typePlug-in HybridElectric
Range (WLTP)616km
Battery25.7 kWh107.8 kWh
Electric range76km
Power550kW265kW
0-100 km/h3.8s6.1s
Max DC Charge200kW
10-80% Charge Time31 min
Fuel Economy12.8 kWh/100km (as hybrid)
Boot Space527L645L
Towing2,700kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the BMW XM & Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The BMW XM starts from $309,900 before on-road costs, while the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV opens at $225,900. That makes the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV the more affordable entry point by $84,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $340,890 and $248,490 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

25.7kWh usable

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

108.4kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 44m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 200kW · 0–80%

33 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 200kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The BMW XM features a 14.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV gets a 12.8-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The BMW XM stands out with Bowers & Wilkins audio that you will not find on the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV. The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV counters with Burmester audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the BMW XM gets merino leather upholstery while the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV offers nappa leather.

Drivetrain

The BMW XM uses a Plug-in Hybrid producing 550kW and 1000Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.8 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV responds with a Electric making 265kW and 800Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.1 seconds.

The BMW XM has the clear power advantage at 550kW vs 265kW. In the real-world sprint, the BMW XM is 2.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 25.7kWh (BMW XM) vs 107.8kWh (Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV).

Space & Comfort

The BMW XM measures 5,110mm long on a 3,105mm wheelbase, 15mm shorter than the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV at 5,125mm (3,210mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 527L in the BMW XM and 645L in the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV, giving the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV a 118L advantage. The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the BMW XM leads with a 2,700kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 12.4m

BMW XM Label
11.4mTighter
Best
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV EQS 450 4MATIC SUV
12.4m
Worst
BMW XM Label
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV EQS 450 4MATIC SUV
12.4m · Large

Based on 12.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (BMW XM) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BMW XM if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BMW XM and Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV?

The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV is the cheapest at $225,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the BMW XM by $84,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BMW XM uses the least fuel at 2.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV has the largest boot at 645L.

Which can tow the most?

The BMW XM has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,700kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The BMW XM makes the most power at 550kW. The BMW XM is quickest to 100km/h in 3.8s.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs