CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBYD Atto 2 vs KGM Torres
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BYD Atto 2 vs KGM Torres

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecBYDKGM
Price (RRP)$31,990$34,990
Range (WLTP)345km
Battery51.3 kWh
Power130kW120kW
0-100 km/h8.5s11.8s
Max DC Charge90kW
10-80% Charge Time40 min
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km
Boot Space400L455L
Towing1,500kg1,500kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Price Breakdown

The BYD Atto 2 starts from $31,990 before on-road costs, while the KGM Torres opens at $34,990. That makes the BYD Atto 2 the more affordable entry point by $3,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $35,189 and $38,489 respectively.

The BYD Atto 2 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The KGM Torres, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The BYD Atto 2 features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 8.8-inch digital dash, while the KGM Torres gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Torres counters with ambient lighting that the BYD Atto 2 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the BYD Atto 2 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the KGM Torres offers leather.

Drivetrain

The BYD Atto 2 uses a Electric producing 130kW and 290Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The KGM Torres responds with a Turbo GDi making 120kW and 280Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.8 seconds.

The BYD Atto 2 has the clear power advantage at 130kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the BYD Atto 2 is 3.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BYD Atto 2 measures 4,310mm long on a 2,620mm wheelbase, 390mm shorter than the KGM Torres at 4,700mm (2,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Torres generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 400L in the BYD Atto 2 and 455L in the KGM Torres, giving the KGM Torres a 55L advantage.

For towing, the KGM Torres leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.2m

BYD Atto 2 Dynamic
10.6mTighter
Best
KGM Torres ELX
11.2m
Worst
BYD Atto 2
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
KGM Torres
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (BYD Atto 2) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Torres). The KGM Torres has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BYD Atto 2 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the KGM Torres if: You need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The BYD Atto 2 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the KGM Torres has a clear edge. The KGM Torres adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BYD Atto 2 and KGM Torres?

The BYD Atto 2 is the cheapest at $31,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the KGM Torres by $3,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The KGM Torres uses the least fuel at 7.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — BYD Atto 2 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The KGM Torres has the largest boot at 455L.

Which can tow the most?

The BYD Atto 2 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Torres has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The BYD Atto 2 makes the most power at 130kW. The BYD Atto 2 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.5s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs