CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChevrolet Silverado 2500 HD vs Ford F-150
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD vs Ford F-150

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD: we're still completing wheelbase, 0-100km/h, turning circle, fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecChevroletFord
Price (RRP)$168,000$114,950
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power350kW298kW
Fuel Economy12.5 L/100km
Towing4,500kg4,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD & Ford F-150

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD starts from $168,000 before on-road costs, while the Ford F-150 opens at $114,950. That makes the Ford F-150 the more affordable entry point by $53,050.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $184,800 and $126,445 respectively.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD features a 13.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Ford F-150 gets a 12-inch display and 12-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate and Bose audio — features our data doesn't list for the Ford F-150. The Ford F-150 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD uses a 6.6L Duramax Turbo-Diesel V8 producing 350kW and 1322Nm of torque, sent through a 10-speed automatic to a 4WD layout.

The Ford F-150 responds with a Petrol V6 Twin-Turbo (EcoBoost) making 298kW and 678Nm, paired to a 10-speed automatic driving all four wheels.

The Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD has the clear power advantage at 350kW vs 298kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD measures 6,387mm long, 493mm longer than the Ford F-150 at 5,894mm (3,694mm wheelbase).

For towing, the Ford F-150 leads with a 4,500kg braked capacity vs 4,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

14.6m diameter

Large

Ford F-150 XLT 4x4 Double Cab SWB
14.6m
Ford F-150 XLT 4x4 Double Cab SWB
14.6m · Large

Based on 14.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

14.6 m Ø

Large

9.0 m road
Ford F-150 Turning circle · Ø 14.6 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 12.8 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

2.0 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years (Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD) vs 5 years (Ford F-150). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Chevrolet's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford F-150 if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD and Ford F-150 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD and Ford F-150?

The Ford F-150 is the cheapest at $114,950 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD by $53,050.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Ford F-150 uses the least fuel at 12.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD and Ford F-150 carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD has the highest braked towing capacity at 4,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD makes the most power at 350kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia