CUPRA Terramar vs Hyundai Kona
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 7 Sep 2026, price 21 Oct 2026
Driver assistance, as the maker lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
$53,990RRP
- no option data for this car
$33,950RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the CUPRA Terramar & Hyundai Kona
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The CUPRA Terramar starts from $53,990 before on-road costs, while the Hyundai Kona opens at $33,950. That makes the Hyundai Kona the more affordable entry point by $20,040.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $59,389 and $37,345 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the CUPRA Terramar by roughly $1,280 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
The CUPRA Terramar holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Hyundai Kona. Adult occupant protection scored 89% for the CUPRA Terramar and 80% for the Hyundai Kona.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 9 of 10 key ADAS systems on the CUPRA Terramar, against 6 on the Hyundai Kona.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the CUPRA Terramar and 7 in the Hyundai Kona.
Recalls on our record
CUPRA Terramar
- REC-006614 · published 2 Jun 2026Due to a software issue, under certain driving conditions the electric power steering system may become temporarily inoperable.Year range on the notice: 2025
- REC-006608 · published 12 May 2026Electric power steering software fault can disable assistanceYear range on the notice: 2024 - 2026
Hyundai Kona
- REC-006734 · published 28 Sep 2026Rear centre seat belt buckle anchor below specificationYear range on the notice: 2025 - 2026
- REC-006589 · published 20 Apr 2026Due to a software issue, the Instrument Panel Cluster (IPC) may fail to illuminate the visual vehicle speed, fuel level and other critical safety information.Year range on the notice: 2025
- REC-005978 · published 6 Jun 2024The Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) valve sensor may have been exposed to soldering flux contamination during manufacture.Year range on the notice: 2024
- 2 more on the model page.
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The CUPRA Terramar features a 12.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Hyundai Kona gets a 12.3-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The CUPRA Terramar stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats, power tailgate and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Hyundai Kona. The Hyundai Kona counters with Apple CarPlay and wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The CUPRA Terramar uses a 4-cyl Turbo Petrol MHEV producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.3 seconds.
The Hyundai Kona responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 180Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.9 seconds.
Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the CUPRA Terramar is 0.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The CUPRA Terramar measures 4,519mm long on a 2,681mm wheelbase, 169mm longer than the Hyundai Kona at 4,350mm (2,660mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the CUPRA Terramar generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 508L in the CUPRA Terramar and 407L in the Hyundai Kona, giving the CUPRA Terramar a 101L advantage.
For towing, the CUPRA Terramar leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,300kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m to 11.4m
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,625/year for the CUPRA Terramar and $1,881/year for the Hyundai Kona. That is a $256 annual difference in favour of the CUPRA Terramar.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (CUPRA Terramar) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai Kona). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the CUPRA Terramar if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer CUPRA's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Hyundai Kona if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
CUPRA Terramar: Top CarSorted Score, 77 vs 75, but the Hyundai Kona is $20,040 cheaper
The CUPRA Terramar comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (77 vs 75), taking 5 of 6 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (CUPRA Terramar ahead by 9), safety (CUPRA Terramar ahead by 8), practicality (CUPRA Terramar ahead by 7). The CUPRA Terramar will save you roughly $256 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the CUPRA Terramar has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, CUPRA Terramar and Hyundai Kona?
The Hyundai Kona is the cheapest at $33,950 before on-road costs. That undercuts the CUPRA Terramar by $20,040.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The CUPRA Terramar uses the least fuel at 5.7L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
The CUPRA Terramar has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.
Which has the most boot space?
The CUPRA Terramar has the largest boot at 508L with the seats up.
Which can tow the most?
The CUPRA Terramar has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!













