CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Fiat 500 vs Suzuki Swift
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Fiat 500 vs Suzuki Swift

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 4 Sep 2026, price 21 Oct 2026

Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Fiat 500Dolcevita2?010
Suzuki SwiftGL6?06

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecFiatSuzuki
Price (RRP)$28,900$23,990
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$28,900RRP

  • no option data for this car

$23,990RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power51kW59.6kW
0-100 km/h12.9s12.4s
Fuel Economy4.8 L/100km4 L/100km
Boot (seats up)185L267L
Warranty3yr / 150k km3yr / 100k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data3 Stars

Track the Fiat 500 & Suzuki Swift

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Fiat 500 starts from $28,900 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Swift opens at $23,990. That makes the Suzuki Swift the more affordable entry point by $4,910.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $31,790 and $26,389 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Swift by roughly $1,140 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Fiat 500

  • REC-003875 · published 30 May 2019On affected vehicles the drive axle may break due to a nonconformity in the production process.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
  • REC-003732 · published 26 Jul 2016Possible non-conformity of the right front seat guide tracks.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
  • REC-003693 · published 18 Apr 2016There is a potential deviation in the buckle heat treatment process.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range

Suzuki Swift

  • REC-006262 · published 5 Feb 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the steering shaft nut may not be tightened to specifications.Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2023
  • REC-006259 · published 5 Feb 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the steering shaft nut may not be tightened to specifications.Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2023
  • REC-001268 · published 13 Jun 2019Side airbags, curtain airbags and seatbelt pretensioner may be inadvertently deployed when the rear door is slammed shut.Year range on the notice: 2017 - 2019
  • 10 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Fiat 500 features a 7-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Swift gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the Fiat 500 gets fabric upholstery while the Suzuki Swift offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Fiat 500 uses a MultiAir Petrol producing 51kW and 102Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed dualogic automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 12.9 seconds.

The Suzuki Swift responds with a Petrol making 59.6kW and 109Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12.4 seconds.

The Suzuki Swift has the clear power advantage at 59.6kW vs 51kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Suzuki Swift is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Fiat 500 measures 3,571mm long on a 2,300mm wheelbase, 289mm shorter than the Suzuki Swift at 3,860mm (2,450mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Suzuki Swift generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 185L in the Fiat 500 and 267L in the Suzuki Swift, giving the Suzuki Swift a 82L advantage. The Suzuki Swift seats 5 vs 4.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m to 9.8m

TightestFiat 500 DolcevitaTightest turn at 9.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Fiat 500 Dolcevita
9.3mTighter
Best
Suzuki Swift GL
9.8m
Worst
Fiat 500 Dolcevita
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Swift GL
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestFiat 500Tightest turn at 9.3m, needs the least road to swing around
Fiat 500Tightest9.3 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Suzuki Swift9.8 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,368/year for the Fiat 500 and $1,140/year for the Suzuki Swift. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Swift.

Warranty: 3 years / 150,000km (Fiat 500) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Swift). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Fiat 500 if: You or prefer Fiat's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Swift if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The CarSorted Score calls this a draw (60 vs 66). The Fiat 500 and Suzuki Swift trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Suzuki Swift will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Suzuki Swift has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Fiat 500 and Suzuki Swift?

The Suzuki Swift is the cheapest at $23,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Fiat 500 by $4,910.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Swift uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Suzuki Swift holds a 3-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Fiat 500, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Suzuki Swift has the largest boot at 267L with the seats up.

Which is the most powerful?

The Suzuki Swift makes the most power at 59.6kW. The Suzuki Swift is quickest to 100km/h in 12.4s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars · Best hybrid cars