CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Mustang vs MG Cyberster
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Mustang vs MG Cyberster

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordMG
Price (RRP)$72,990$99,900
Range (WLTP)519km
Battery77 kWh
Power232kW250kW
0-100 km/h5.2s
Max DC Charge144kW
10-80% Charge Time25 min
Fuel Economy9.4 L/100km16.4 kWh/100km
Boot Space249L
Warranty5yr / unlimited10yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Price Breakdown

The Ford Mustang starts from $72,990 before on-road costs, while the MG Cyberster opens at $99,900. That makes the Ford Mustang the more affordable entry point by $26,910.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $80,289 and $109,890 respectively.

The MG Cyberster qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Ford Mustang, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the MG Cyberster by roughly $9,460 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford Mustang stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats, Bang & Olufsen audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the MG Cyberster. The MG Cyberster counters with Apple CarPlay and head-up display. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Mustang uses a Petrol I4 Turbo producing 232kW and 475Nm of torque, sent through a 10-speed automatic to a RWD layout.

The MG Cyberster responds with a Electric Motor making 250kW and 475Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.2 seconds.

The MG Cyberster has the clear power advantage at 250kW vs 232kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Mustang measures 4,811mm long on a 2,719mm wheelbase, 276mm longer than the MG Cyberster at 4,535mm (2,690mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Mustang generally means more rear legroom.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.5m diameter

Average

Ford Mustang EcoBoost Fastback
11.5m
Ford Mustang
11.5m · Average

Based on 11.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,679/year for the Ford Mustang and $787/year for the MG Cyberster. That is a $1,892 annual difference in favour of the MG Cyberster.

Estimated annual total: $2,679 (Ford Mustang) vs $787 (MG Cyberster). The MG Cyberster saves you roughly $1,892 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years (Ford Mustang) vs 10 years / 999,999km (MG Cyberster). The MG Cyberster has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Mustang if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the MG Cyberster if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Ford Mustang and MG Cyberster trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The MG Cyberster will save you roughly $1,892 a year in fuel. The MG Cyberster adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Coupes · All Convertibles