CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Ford Ranger Super Duty vs MG U9 EV
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Ranger Super Duty vs MG U9 EV

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Ford Ranger Super Duty: we're still completing 0-100km/h, fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.

MG U9 EV: not on sale yet, so MG hasn't published length, width, height, wheelbase and kerb weight, plus 8 others.

Blank cells below mean we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecFordMG
Price (RRP)$82,990$78,990
Fuel typeDieselElectric
Range (WLTP)—430km
Battery—102.2 kWh
Power154kW—
0-100 km/h—5.8s
Towing4,500kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited—
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data
V2LNoYes

Track the Ford Ranger Super Duty & MG U9 EV

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Ford Ranger Super Duty starts from $82,990 before on-road costs, while the MG U9 EV opens at $78,990. That makes the MG U9 EV the more affordable entry point by $4,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $91,289 and $86,889 respectively.

The MG U9 EV currently qualifies for the electric-vehicle FBT exemption, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Ford Ranger Super Duty does not: only battery-electric vehicles qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

102.2kWh usable

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Ranger Super Duty features a 12-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the MG U9 EV gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford Ranger Super Duty stands out with wireless charging — features our data doesn't list for the MG U9 EV. The MG U9 EV counters with V2L and JBL audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Ford Ranger Super Duty gets cloth upholstery while the MG U9 EV offers leather.

Drivetrain

Detailed powertrain specifications are not yet available for both models.

Space & Comfort

For towing, the Ford Ranger Super Duty leads with a 4,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

13.6m diameter

Large

Ford Ranger Super Duty Single Cab Cab-Chassis
13.6m
←
Ford Ranger Super Duty Single Cab Cab-Chassis
13.6m · Large

Based on 13.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

13.6 m Ø

Large

9.0 m road
Ford Ranger Super Duty Turning circle · Ø 13.6 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 12.0 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

✓

Standard parking bay

2.0 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

✕

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Ranger Super Duty if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the MG U9 EV if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG U9 EV takes 2 of 3 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Ranger Super Duty and MG U9 EV?

The MG U9 EV is the cheapest at $78,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford Ranger Super Duty by $4,000.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Ford Ranger Super Duty and MG U9 EV carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Ranger Super Duty has the highest braked towing capacity at 4,500kg.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia