CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Ford Ranger vs HSV Maloo
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Ranger vs HSV Maloo

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 1 Oct 2026, price 22 Jul 2026

Specifications in progress

HSV Maloo: we're still completing length, width, height, wheelbase and kerb weight, plus 8 others.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecFordHSV
Price (RRP)$37,130$58,990
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power125kW317kW
0-100 km/h10.5s—
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km—
Towing3,500kg—
Warranty5yr / Unlimited—
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Ford Ranger & HSV Maloo

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Ford Ranger starts from $37,130 before on-road costs, while the HSV Maloo opens at $58,990. That makes the Ford Ranger the more affordable entry point by $21,860.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $40,843 and $64,889 respectively.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Ranger features a 12-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the HSV Maloo gets a 8-inch display.

The Ford Ranger stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the HSV Maloo. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Ranger uses a Diesel Turbo producing 125kW and 405Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The HSV Maloo lines up making 317kW and 550Nm, paired to a tr6060 tremec 6-speed manual driving the rear wheels.

The HSV Maloo has the clear power advantage at 317kW vs 125kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.9m diameter

Large

Ford Ranger XL 4x2 Hi-Rider Single Cab Cab-Chassis
12.9m
←
Ford Ranger XL 4x2 Hi-Rider Single Cab Cab-Chassis
12.9m · Large

Based on 12.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.9 m Ø

Large

9.0 m road
Ford Ranger Turning circle · Ø 12.9 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 11.3 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

✓

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

✕

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Ranger if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the HSV Maloo if: You prioritise performance, or prefer HSV's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Ranger comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (67 vs 38), taking 1 of 2 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (Ford Ranger ahead by 44), safety (Ford Ranger ahead by 34), practicality (Ford Ranger ahead by 30). The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Ranger and HSV Maloo?

The Ford Ranger is the cheapest at $37,130 before on-road costs. That undercuts the HSV Maloo by $21,860.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Ford Ranger uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Ford Ranger holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for HSV Maloo, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Ranger has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The HSV Maloo makes the most power at 317kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia