Ford Ranger vs Toyota LandCruiser 200
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Toyota LandCruiser 200: we're still completing price, kerb weight, 0-100km/h, ground clearance and fuel tank.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the Ford Ranger & Toyota LandCruiser 200
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The Ford Ranger stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota LandCruiser 200. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Ford Ranger gets cloth upholstery while the Toyota LandCruiser 200 offers leather.
Drivetrain
The Ford Ranger uses a Diesel Turbo producing 125kW and 405Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The Toyota LandCruiser 200 lines up making 195kW and 650Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic driving all four wheels.
The Toyota LandCruiser 200 has the clear power advantage at 195kW vs 125kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Ford Ranger measures 5,225mm long on a 3,270mm wheelbase, 275mm longer than the Toyota LandCruiser 200 at 4,950mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Ranger generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 200 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.8m to 12.9m
Based on 12.9m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Ford Ranger and $2,936/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 200. That is a $969 annual difference in favour of the Ford Ranger.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Ranger) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Toyota LandCruiser 200). The Ford Ranger has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Ford Ranger if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 200 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Ford Ranger takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The Ford Ranger will save you roughly $969 a year in fuel. The Ford Ranger adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Ford Ranger and Toyota LandCruiser 200?
The Ford Ranger is the cheapest at $37,130 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Ford Ranger uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Ford Ranger holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Toyota LandCruiser 200, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which can tow the most?
The Ford Ranger has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Ford Ranger has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Toyota LandCruiser 200 makes the most power at 195kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
